Medicare and Medicaid Cuts in Trump’s Big, Beautiful Bill: What’s at Stake
Updated: June 9, 2025, 11:08 PM 
Seniors, veterans, and healthcare advocates are pushing back as President Trump’s massive tax bill sparks fears of deep cuts to Medicare and Medicaid.
President Donald Trump’s recently unveiled “Big, Beautiful” bill—a sweeping package of tax cuts and entitlement reforms—has ignited controversy on Capitol Hill and beyond. While the legislation promises significant tax relief, critics warn that it could come at the expense of key social safety net programs like Medicare and Medicaid.
What’s in Trump’s ‘Big, Beautiful’ Bill?
The bill, which recently passed the House and is now before the Senate, aims to make Trump-era tax cuts permanent while expanding deductions for families and small businesses.
But the legislation also includes provisions that would dramatically reduce federal spending on Medicare and Medicaid over the next decade.
Budget analysts estimate the bill could lead to:
- Over $3 trillion in tax cuts
- Roughly $2 trillion in spending reductions to Medicare and Medicaid
- Caps on future benefit growth tied to inflation
Supporters argue that these reforms are necessary to reduce the federal deficit and ensure the long-term solvency of entitlement programs. But opponents say they threaten to dismantle essential healthcare protections for millions of Americans.
Seniors and Low-Income Families at Risk
Medicare currently provides health insurance to more than 65 million Americans, mostly seniors. Medicaid, covers about 83 million low-income individuals, including children, people with disabilities, and elderly nursing home residents.
Under the proposed bill:
- Medicare Advantage plans may see funding rollbacks, potentially leading to higher premiums or reduced coverage.
- Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act could be reversed, leaving millions uninsured.
- Cost-sharing requirements may increase, especially for prescription drugs and long-term care services.
Health policy experts warn that such changes would hit seniors, rural communities, and disabled Americans the hardest, undoing decades of bipartisan efforts to protect these populations.
Trump Base Responds With Concern
Many of Trump’s most loyal supporters—older, working-class voters—are expressing alarm over the potential cuts.
“We voted for lower taxes, not to lose our Medicare,” said Carol H., a 74-year-old retiree from Ohio who relies on Medicare for her cancer treatments. “This bill feels like a betrayal.”
Polling from Pew Research and Gallup in May 2025 shows a sharp divide among Republicans: While many still back Trump’s broader economic agenda, a growing number are uneasy with threats to programs they depend on in retirement.
Political Fallout Ahead of 2026 Elections
With the Senate poised for a narrow vote and the 2026 midterms on the horizon, Democrats are seizing on the bill as a major campaign issue.
Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA) said the bill “puts Wall Street above Main Street, gutting the programs families rely on to survive.”
Meanwhile, some Republicans are distancing themselves from the bill’s more controversial provisions, with Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) calling for “protections for the most vulnerable Americans.”
What’s Next for Medicare and Medicaid?
The Senate is expected to debate amendments to the bill over the coming weeks. Advocates are urging constituents to call their lawmakers and attend town halls to voice opposition.
If the bill passes unchanged, major structural changes to Medicare and Medicaid could begin as early as Fiscal Year 2026, reshaping healthcare access for tens of millions of Americans.
Stay informed and protect your health. Medicare and Medicaid provide essential coverage for over 150 million Americans — understanding your eligibility, benefits, and upcoming policy changes is vital to maintaining access to care.
For personalized assistance or the latest updates, visit Medicare.gov, Medicaid.gov, or call 1-800-MEDICARE (1-800-633-4227).
How Trump could change Medicare : Shots – Health News : NPR
How Dr. Oz And Trump Could Affect Medicare And Medicaid
How Trump bill Medicaid cuts will impact U.S. health care
Are people Really Going to lose medicare and medicaid – Search
Demonstrators protested Medicaid cuts outside of the Capitol last week.
Credit…Joe Raedle/Getty Images
Margot Sanger-Katz
By Margot Sanger-Katz
Reporting from Washington
Published June 29, 2025
Updated July 1, 2025
Republicans’ marquee domestic policy bill that is making its way through the Senate would result in deeper cuts and more Americans losing health insurance coverage than the original measure that passed the House last month, according to new estimates from the Congressional Budget Office.
According to a report published late Saturday night, the legislation would mean 11.8 million more Americans would become uninsured by 2034. Federal spending on Medicaid, Medicare and Obamacare would be reduced by more than $1.1 trillion over that period — with more than $1 trillion of those cuts coming from Medicaid alone.
The fresh estimates make official what many analysts had already predicted and some Republican lawmakers had feared. The size and scope of the health care cuts in the bill, particularly from Medicaid, have been hotly debated, with fiscal hawks pressing for bigger reductions and other Republicans resisting them as they consider the impact on their constituents and health providers in their districts and states.
They are also at odds with President Trump’s vow not to touch Medicaid except to do away with waste and fraud.
The scale of the proposed reductions in Medicaid is unprecedented in the history of the program, which has tended to expand coverage over time since its creation in 1965.
The cuts in the bill are achieved through numerous provisions, but the bulk of the Medicaid savings come from two big features.
One would establish a new, strict national work requirement for some people on the program, who would need to demonstrate they had worked at least 80 hours the month before they sign up, or qualified for an exemption. The Senate version applies this provision to the poor parents of children older than 14 in addition to childless adults without disabilities, the group targeted by the House version. The budget office estimated that that provision alone would reduce federal spending by more than $325 billion over the decade.
The second big source of savings comes from new restrictions on a strategy many states use to finance Medicaid, by imposing taxes on medical providers to leverage a larger federal contribution. The bill’s restrictions on provider taxes and a related mechanism known as state directed payments would cut spending by a combined $375 billion, according to the report. The House bill would freeze the tax rate for most states, but the Senate version would require many states to lower their existing taxes, beginning in 2027.
The provider tax provisions are controversial among senators. Several who represent states with poor, rural populations have objected to the scale of the cuts, including Senators Susan Collins of Maine, Josh Hawley of Missouri, and Thom Tillis of North Carolina. Senate leaders added a last-minute provision Saturday to try to alleviate that concern — a $25 billion fund to support rural health care providers.
But Mr. Tillis voted against a procedural move to advance the bill on Saturday, citing the Medicaid effects as too extreme for his state, and said he would oppose the bill. Mr. Hawley, who voted in favor of taking up the bill, said he would back the measure even as he denounced the Medicaid cuts as “bad.”
The specifics of the legislation remain in flux. The Senate’s parliamentarian, who is reviewing provisions to ensure they comply with the chamber’s rules, is continuing to evaluate a few health care provisions.
Just Sunday morning, she ruled that several health care provisions violated the rules.
Her ruling included two that would cause more spending on Medicare and Medicaid in Alaska and Hawaii,, according to the Senate Budget Committee. Republicans had added them in part to win over Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, who had raised concerns about the Medicaid cuts and who voted on Saturday night to take up the bill.
The parliamentarian also identified problems with several provisions that would increase paperwork requirements for people enrolling in Medicaid, and the repeal of a regulation that would require a minimum staffing ratio in nursing homes paid by Medicaid.
Just after the late-night procedural vote to bring up the bill, Senator Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, who had initially voted to block it but then switched at the last moment, told reporters that he would propose an amendment that would cut Medicaid even further. His proposal would slowly reduce federal spending on people who have become eligible for Medicaid because of an expansion created by the Affordable Care Act. That change, if it were added, would likely increase the size of the cuts substantially and add to the number of Americans who would lose Medicaid coverage.
Are people Really Going to lose medicare and medicaid – Search
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
What’s Next for the Fuzzy Big Beautiful Bill?
While the Senate’s passage is a major win for President Trump and GOP leadership, the bill’s future remains uncertain. The House of Representatives must now reconcile its own version with the Senate’s amendments—a process complicated by deep divisions within the Republican caucus. Speaker Mike Johnson can afford to lose only three GOP votes if he hopes to pass the bill along party lines.
Fiscal conservatives in the House are alarmed by the projected increase in the national debt, while moderates are uneasy about the deep cuts to Medicaid and nutrition assistance. With the July 4 deadline looming, the coming days will determine whether the “big, beautiful bill” becomes law or stalls in the face of intraparty resistance.
Key Takeaways
- The “big, beautiful bill” passed the Senate by a single vote, with Vice President Vance breaking the tie.
- Only three Republican senators—Tillis, Paul, and Collins—voted against the bill, joining all Democrats in opposition.
- The measure now faces a challenging path in the House, where GOP unity is far from assured.
As the nation watches, the fate of the big beautiful bill will hinge on whether House Republicans can bridge their differences and deliver President Trump’s signature legislation before the Independence Day deadline. Which Senators Voted for the Big Beautiful Bill? Full Breakdown of the Historic Senate Vote
Margot Sanger-Katz is a reporter covering health care policy and public health for the Upshot section of The Times.
Senate Version of Trump’s Policy Bill Would Slash Medicaid Spending Even More – The New York Times
We Asked ChatGPT What Would Happen to the Economy If Every American Had the Same Net Worth
Trump pledged not to cut Medicare – but his budget bill does just that | Morningstar
Trump signs controversial spending bill during White House 4th of July celebrations
How Much Debt The Average American Is In, How It Compares Globally
How America’s Income Gap Compares To The Rest Of The World
How Deep in Debt is America Compared to Other Countries?
What Trump Has Done With Medicare So Far | Kiplinger
is medicare going away under trump – Search
Josh Turner – Unsung Hero (Official Music Video)