Cancer Quick Facts

Covid affected POC disproportionately though.

White rage theory is obviously true.
From the award-winning author of Medical Apartheid, an exposé of the rush to own and exploit the raw materials of life—including yours. Hillary Clinton: Britain is “on the path to fascism MPs are “the path to authoritarianism [and] fascism”, Hillary Clinton has said. “The truth is [Democrats] are covering up that Hillary Clinton colluded with the Russians to get dirt on Trump…. to feed it to the FBI….

Communists hate the free market and Biden’s plan is to put us so far in debt we won’t be able to pay the interest. Then our money will be worthless and they will be able to usher it into socialism. Biden’s spending spree is killing the construction industry. Many in that field say when they get a quote from suppliers they are good for only 24 hours.

Used to be two weeks. I have been told by some people in the business that they are forced to postpone much work until after…. the building costs come down. People aren’t wanting to pay for large projects right now. QUOTE: My boss doesn’t know if we’ll be able to make it next year. He’s worked his butt off to build this company. It’s pretty sad.
Rumble — China rewrites the bible as the left wants to remove it (rumble.com) 

Evil wants you to die forever God wants you to live forever the choice is clear it is real-As the evil of paying China for a bio weapon and let them have it 11 days before Joe and Obama ran out of office stealing 250 billion in gold he than sent to Iran….. 

Think your body is your own to control and dispose of as you wish? Think again. The United States Patent Office has granted at least 40,000 patents on genes controlling the most basic processes of human life, and more are pending. If you undergo surgery in many hospitals you must sign away ownership rights to your excised tissues, even if they turn out to have medical and fiscal value. Life itself is rapidly becoming a wholly owned subsidiary of the medical- industrial complex.

Deadly Monopolies is a powerful, disturbing, and deeply researched book that illuminates this “life patent” gold rush and its harmful, and even lethal, consequences for public health. It examines the shaky legal, ethical, and social bases for Big Pharma’s argument that such patents are necessary to protect their investments in new drugs and treatments, arguing that they instead stifle the research, competition, and innovation that can drive down costs and save lives. In opposing the commodification of the body, Harriet Washington provides a crucial human dimension to an often all-too-abstract debate.

Like the bestseller The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks, Deadly Monopolies reveals in shocking detail just how far the profit motive has encroached in colonizing human life and compromising medical ethics.

It is sure to stir debate—and instigate change. Amazon.com: Deadly Monopolies: The Shocking Corporate Takeover of Life Itself–And the Consequences for Your Health and Our Medical Future. (9780385528924): Washington, Harriet A.: Books

Medical Apartheid: The Dark History of Medical Experimentation on Black Americans from Colonial Times to the Present: 9780767915472: Medicine & Health Science Books @ Amazon.com

 Govt. does not dictate my health decisions — Liberals are now societies’ conformists. Exiting the matrix.

Economics professor Dr. Asatar Bair – applauds the Soviet Union ruler Joseph Stalin’s discussion style and contributions to Marxism …. while others point out that Stalin’s regime killed millions of people.

The man was neither savior nor saint, but he was, at once, a very successful revolutionary, a contributor to Marxist theory, and said to be a great listener and collaborator during discussions.

Stalin intentionally starved millions of Ukrainian’s, killed millions and purged his own people and threatened the free world until 1953.
See You Again – Music Travel Love (Lyrics).

Tell us more about this ‘fair and balanced’ view you hold?
The fairness doctrine of the United States Federal Communications Commission (FCC), introduced in 1949, was a policy that required the holders of broadcast licenses to both present controversial issues of public importance and to do so in a manner that was honest, equitable, and balanced.
The New York Times was a failing newspaper before changing its business model to muckraking on Trump. Fox News had to drop its “Fair and Balanced” motto because that’s false advertising. CNN should be renamed the “Know-Nothing Network.” Info Wars‘ listeners are freakin’ certifiable.

If you’ve spent any time on social media, or in the inescapable presence of extended family, you’ve heard someone slagging on the news sources they disagree with. Their main grievance is, of course, how biased and unfair those news sources are when compared to their reliable, fact-based preferences.

While a mere annoyance in that moment, such mindsets have become a widespread social ill. We as a society require a consensus of truth to make sound social decisions, and the news is one of the gatekeepers to the facts required to build those truths.

When news content begins to prioritize opinions and tribalistic tendencies over journalistic integrity, it clouds the entire media landscape with suspicion, deepens political polarization, and allows readers to sidestep unwelcome evidence with alternative narratives.

Such a state is pernicious at the best of times, but in dire times, such as the coronavirus pandemic, the spread of unreliable information can be of fatal concern. Stalin created the Gulag archipelago in Russia.

I believe the gulags were in operation under Lenin, but expanded under Stalin. Correct. For people who would like to read about that.

Gulag | Definition, History, Prison, & Facts | Britannica

As a progressive music fan, the best insight into Stalin’s character for me came from (1) Dmitri Shoshtakovich’s memoir, Testimony – Bing video. Stalin was a sadist and DS spent the years after WW2 perpetually worried about a knock on the door for not orchestrating Georgian folk tunes. 2/ Even if he was forced to write a Stalin Prize-winning treacle like March of the Soviet Secret Police. Not the most important atrocity, but as a modernist to my toenails, I’ll never forgive how the attacks on “formalism” shut down the burgeoning post-revolutionary art scene.

3/ That DS managed to write such remarkable and original music up until his death while spitting out what was needed to placate the authorities is a Stalin testament (testimony) to the resilience of the human spirit. 4/ And the fact that he didn’t emigrate to where his most enthusiastic audiences were like Stravinsky and Prokofiev is a feature, not a bug for me.

Stalin testament (testimony) to the resilience of the human spirit.

He was a Russian patriot and honorable for that. Stalin was not perfect, but without him the USSR would not have been able to move from feudalism to a fully industrialized country. Holodomor genocide question – Wikipedia  

Aside from me personally being a direct product of immigration due to this precise event, this post from an established university states the most realistic death toll was 3.9 million.

Holodomor | Holocaust and Genocide Studies | College of Liberal Arts | University of Minnesota (umn.edu)
A Soviet-Era Survivor Revealed How Life Was Like Under Joseph Stalin (businessinsider.com)

Marxism is about absolute control of everything by the state.

Under him 40 million perished so why it says 20 million is further proof that the historians are still split over the biggest blood curdling monster history has seen since the days of Genghis Khan . Soviet repressions of Polish citizens (1939–1946) – Wikipedia  

Apparently it takes the genocide of about 7 to 10 million innocent lives to be deemed a “very successful revolutionary. Any credibility or “decent attributes” you have is kind of lost when that amount of blood is on your hands. The myth of it being an intentional act by Stalin was started by Ukrainian fascists during WWII (because Ukraine allied with the Nazis) To say that Stalin was a threat to “the free world” during this period of time is implied Holocaust revisionism. Who killed more people? Hitler Stalin Mao!!!

His mother wanted him to become a priest

Josef Stalin: Positives and Negatives by Adam Baumgardner
Fun fact: Johnny Cash was one of the first Americans to know of Stalin’s death (since he was in the Air Force, he monitored radio traffic in Europe, where he was stationed), and was/is worth ten of Stalin.

Remember when Stalin wanted to kill all the intellectuals and then no doctors wanted to tell him that he was dying (the Doctors Plot) they made a movie out of it.

And as we all know, the US has never committed any war crimes or contributed to any genocides in any way whatsoever and has never deliberately acted to quell democratic movements in weaker countries to keep them unstable and exploitable by our capitalist interests. America intentionally killed millions of people in India with famine.
America also kills like 20 million people annually from preventing people from getting food, proper medication, housing, and other easily preventable causes. Almost none of what you’re saying is true lmao. the USSR did all those things as well, even when they all lived in communes https://t.co/ErquySXZiB” / Twitter

“Kill Every Buffalo You Can! Every Buffalo Dead Is an Indian Gone”
Knowledge is power. The more we understand others, the better we are armed in dealing with them. wait until you find out what American founding fathers did to Africans and Native Americans… Garry Kasparov Keynote: Molotov-Ribbentrop 80 – Toronto September 12, 2019.
This idiot is proof our Socialist Progressive so called Institutes of Higher Learning have failed the United States.

We have #LostGenerations to this   

Stalin was notoriously silent at meetings. A monster. Mao was also. Power corrupted both.One of the problems Marxism has in implementation is the centralized power required for that level of control. So far that power has been abused, as all power like it is. Not to mention murdering all the Polish people in the Katyn massacre and blaming it on Hitler at the time.

His post says a great deal about Dr. Bair and his lack of objectivity and understanding of history. By that standard, Hitler was a great contributor to Fascist theory. Lmao you are the co-founder of an organization of conservatives, whose entire policy is built around starving, punishing, and being cruel to the poor and minorities and that’s before we get to how long your organization covered for one of your guys preying on teen boys.

 Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot are all villains of history and mass murderers. Full stop. Totalitarianism is bad, Whether it’s fascism, communism, or some other kind. It’s all bad. A liberal constitutional republic with checks and balances. That is the way to go.

Before being CCCP dictator, Stalin fundraised for the Russian revolution.

He committed bank robberies, extortion and kidnappings. I’ve also read when Stalin was in his 30s he had sex with 14 year old Lidia Pereprygina. I’m sure you’re NOT a big fan of Churchill, who starved 3 million Indians. Stalin replaced Hitler in 1945 and subjected the co-tine to 8 more years of authoritarian barbarism. 1932-1953 living under 2 golems… Mao and Stalin. intentionally kill Churchill and others are just unfortunate with their famines. The Koch fortune was built in Russia under Stalin, coincidence?

Stalin was perhaps the most lethally effective anti-communist in history . . . . when it comes to incarcerating and killing Communist Party members. The best thing I can say about Stalin is, if I owned a business where he couldn’t murder anybody, I’d select him to manage it over Trump. This didn’t happen, for people interested in learning the actual truth read “Fraud Famine and Fascism” available here: Douglas Tottle – Fraud, Famine and Fascism_text.pdf

“Stalin” is Ukrainian Nazis?

Threatening western satanic hegemony is threatening the free world? Three men enter a bar in the USSR. One says, “Why did Stalin only write in lowercase?” The other one says, “Because he was afraid of capitalism.” The whole bar died laughing

1. Wrong. http://carlbeckpapers.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/cbp/article/view/89…https://garethjones.org/tottlefraud.pdf

2. By purging his own people and killing millions more, do you mean he rightfully sentenced Fascists and Whites to prison? Victims of Stalinism and the Soviet Secret Police: The Comparability and Reliability of the Archival Data-Not the Last Word (tripod.com)

3. Threatened the “free” world? Stalin tried multiple times to work with the “free” world only for the “free” world to sanction the USSR several times.

4. The “free” world proposed several nuclear strikes on China and a land invasion into the USSR which would have killed hundreds of million.

5. This “free” world also traded with the Nazis and Japanese, starved millions in colonies, locked up minorities, and supported the Whites.

White Terror (Russia) – Wikipedia

Он не только морил голодом украинцев,но и казахов. Из-за Сталина наша нация потеряла много людей.

Translate: He not only starved the Ukrainians, but also the Kazakhs. Because of Stalin, our nation lost many people.

The only thing with Stalin in it worth watching- Stalin was a stone-cold sociopath. His papers show he signed death warrants for his former fellow revolutionaries with zero emotion. He murdered Communists by the thousands to “cleanse” the Party.   

Sounds like there’s a new hallucinogen in town.

 Stalin is responsible for killing millions and millions of Russian citizens.
He’s the EPITOME of a TOTALITARIAN DICTATOR !!

 Fuck Stalin.   How the hell do you starve your own people?

Then he sent someone to Mexico to kill the other devil Leon Trotsky.

Didn’t respect other nations territorial integrity.

Stalin is the only reason Emperor Adolph II isn’t presiding over a Nazi world government right now, you chud.
Stalin was a subhuman piece of sh*t! @#$% Stalin. And yet, liberals will embrace this. I honestly can’t understand what has happened to their intellect.
Source: Tell us more about this ‘fair and balanced’ view you hold?” / Twitter
Meeting Blinken, Israel’s Top Diplomat Aims to Fix Netanyahu ‘Mistakes’

U.S. airstrikes target Iran-backed militias in Syria, Iraq (msn.com)

Did you know that bees smell fear?

(Bonus points if you can name the movie that this is from! Movie camera)

Bee Movie/Transcript | Bee Movie Wiki | Fandom

Bee Movie – Bing video
Georgia Audit Documents Expose Significant Election Failures In State’s Largest County 

“This is Bull Sh*t” – Iowa Teacher Fumes She Can’t Teach Marxist CRT in Her Classroom,
 ‘We Need to Tear the Systems Down’ (VIDEO) (thegatewaypundit.com)

I’m not racist. I hate any person that picks out a person & attacks them for the color of their skin or political choice. The person who calls another ‘racist, is truly a racist themselves, trying to project their bigotry onto someone else. Lefties, You do not practice what you preach. That’s a true BIGOT. I detest anyone who tries to destroy our country and our way of life and I don’t care what color they are. I don’t discriminate

There’s no talking to a Democrat but it’s not our fault that’s the way they choose it to be. Democrats are more angry now than ever; they’re angry

because of what they got themselves into.

 They’re the ringleaders and will toss their BLM mates to the curb when they’re done with them. I hate no one. But feel sorry for those who are brainwashed into the false reality of government control. The fascists want us to grow to hate others and to become tribal.

This feeds their strategy. #DemocratsAreWorseThenCancer

According to white liberals you’re a racist if you don’t agree with all they say and believe. Specifically white liberal women. They are the downfall of society… That means you are the opposite of racist. Because the only racists are white liberals. It also means that you’re very likely undereducated, unintelligent and uninformed. They are bigots and the racist dividing our Constitutional Republic against one another!! It was never about flattening the curve, it was about flattening the middle class…

Look up the word “Dixiecrat” — it’s the history of the Democrat Party.

Americans Must Prepare For A Land Invasion Of The United States (free worldnews.tv)

Defend Yourself With The Best Tactical Flashlight Ep. 2512b – Trump Is 100% Insulated, Expect Fireworks, Justice Is Coming.

AOC calls the concerns over the spike in crime ‘hysteria’. https://youtu.be/YGIIpp_AX2w via @YouTube

Vivaldi – Summer – Presto [HD] https://youtu.be/IB5OsPwQVRA via @YouTube

Awesome video from a reformed democrat concerning brainwashing your children.

She speaks the truth !! Don’t allow these racist communist to destroy your children !!

Must listen https://youtu.be/XyCWdTihPyI via YouTube

POWER CORRUPTS / ABSOLUTE POWER CORRUPTS ABSOLUTELY. [EPISODE 48]

We are at the precipice of losing our country to Marxism.

What are you willing to do to save America?

What will you tell your grandchildren when they ask,

“What did you do to HELP save America?”

Frank Gaffney: 2022 Beijing Olympics Is Like 1936 Berlin Olympics (breitbart.com)!!! Frank Gaffney, vice-chair of the Committee on the Present Danger and host of Secure Freedom Radio, likened the 2022 Winter Olympics scheduled to be held    in Beijing, China, to the 1936 Summer Olympics that took place in Berlin, Germany, during the dictatorship of Adolf Hitler. “This is 1936 all over again,” Gaffney said on Friday’s … edition of SiriusXM’s – Breibart News Daily with host Alex Marlow.

“The international community went to Berlin, Germany, and held Olympic games that Adolf Hitler and his Third Reich turned into not only a monster propaganda coup, but a validation, and it emboldened them to believe that they could do whatever they wanted.” 

He added, “The international community would be accommodating, or worse, pulling in behind them. This will be true in spades if Xi Jinping, in the wake of all of the horrors that he has unleashed on the world — not least of which with Tony Fauci’s help, unfortunately — is a murderous pandemic, for gosh sakes.” Marlow stated, “[There is] absolutely no excuse for a single American to participate in the Olympics in Beijing, and I don’t see any logic on why we would legitimize them that way.”

Gaffney helped launch Stop the Genocide Games, a petition calling for a relocation of the 2022 Winter Olympics.

Gaffney remarked, “The only other reason for allowing these games either not to be — moved which is preferable, honestly – or to be boycotted is that the athletes want to go. They want to go and they want to compete. They’ve been training so hard and all that.”

Gaffney said the Chinese Communist Party intends to acquire DNA samples from Olympic athletes for bioengineering purposes.

“But what the athletes need to know, [and] I have not heard very much discussion about this at all, is that without their permission — absolutely, positively, certainly —  their DNA will be expropriated by the Chinese Communist Party and turned into part of their superhuman bioengineering operation,” Gaffney warned.

He continued, “And it won’t just be to make sure that Chinese athletes always win Olympic games in the future. It will be to build — as they are now talking about doing — armies of super warriors whose purpose will be … to destroy the rest of us, or certainly, at least to conquer and dominate us.”

He added, “These are the sorts of things that I think all have to be on the table — and should be urgently used to impress upon both the Olympic Committees — international and American — and the athletes, and the sponsors, and our politicians, because we don’t want any part of these games… We should make sure that nobody participates in them as long as the regime in Beijing is run by the Chinese Communist Party,” he concluded.

Frank Gaffney: 2022 Beijing Olympics Is Like 1936 Berlin Olympics (breitbart.com)
There will probably not come a day again in my lifetime where this country is able to unite regardless of our political views. That ship has sailed…far far far away. Turn me loose, set me free, somewhere in the middle of Free America. Just draw the boundaries, and tell me which side is free, and which side is woke. Build a wall because CRT has been in EVERYTHING to divide & brainwash our young people for DECADES!!

Just tell it like it is.

THAT is totally & completely Strategically designed by this Marxist Democrat party.

They do not want peace and America first.

You would have to do away with both party affiliations — and unite for the greater good — of the Country. It’s Only POWER for them. Almost impossible to believe how wide that divide has gotten. Especially as we come up on the 20 year anniversary of 9/11, an event that brought us closer than ever.

That day is called the coming of Christ!

Until Obama, Biden et. al-at the helm. Such a ship of fools never returns.

I will never unite with America hating liberals..

How can I possibly unite with people who hate our country?

Can’t they see Joe Biden suffers from dementia?

It’s undeniably true that FakePresident Joe Biden exhibits symptoms of someone with a deteriorating brain disease. The guy is a sexual predator also, so maybe he has syphilis of the brain too.
Matt Gaetz, Rudy Giuliani, and President Trump are getting framed for the crimes that the Biden family committed. The new Manhattan DA is being told to do anything necessary to put @realDonaldTrump in jail for life! Whereas President Biden@POTUS 12.1 Million Followers…. will scare you to death or thy should?

There’s a book written about this strategy …

Trump had four years to stop what he knew was a commie takeover but he let the Dems control the narrative every day of his Presidency. Never went on offense, just defense. Obama didn’t take it far enough so Biden and friends now saying FU we aren’t even hiding it. Too late…What now? I have been busy. What did Trump supposedly do now?

He was busy getting things done…. Stopping it probably required more people with integrity than exists in our government.

Or They were outnumbered by Bill Barr. As The Swamp was thicker than anticipated! Durham is our last hope to clean the swamp. Durham filed his petition on Nov 13 and it was docketed on Dec 8th. Initial document hearing on Dec 23rd, the day Barr resigned. Some decisions in the lower court may take precedent before the Supreme Court decision.

Just like the first impeachment when Trump was framed for what Biden did…And no one can do anything about it but whine. I’m pretty much fed up with one bad thing after another happening to America 1st Patriots while we’re being told this or that is GOING to happen and nothing ever happens. Good guys are pretty pathetic when it comes to fighting evil. Arrests or it’s time for We The People to fire these criminals. When is enough actually enough, when China invades or Civil War breaks out? They work for the U.S.
Dr. Fauci NIH Ebola Research Funding – Ebola United States It is time for us to rally and take control of their criminal acts! Enough..Dr. Fauci Ebola research gets millions of dollars of NIH funding… Ebola research exploring how Ebola spreads in people with implication for targeted Ebola treatments.

Next week will be terrible. All predictable. Won’t leave the guy alone!

The Founding Fathers were the original farmers.

Dems are the new framers..
Yup those people are sick and we all need to rally about this crap they are pulling!

It is up to us to stop it!!! @TheJusticeDept@FBI Par for the course.

When will something be done about the corrupt, evil Dems ??

Yup, straight from the liberal, socialist, communist playbook!
 Alinsky 101

The Boomerang Effect Accuses your enemy of what you’re guilty of –

Alinsky’s 12 Rules for Radicals | Virginia Right!

Perfected by #ClintonCrimeFamilyWe the People Had…ENOUGH!!

THE RIGHTEOUSNESS OF GOD IS COMING!!

U.S., Russia and China Race to Address Growing Threats in Heart of Asia (msn.com)

Biden’s behavior raises serious questions about ‘who the heck is in charge’ – Bing video

Joe Biden Accused of Holding Infrastructure Deal ‘Hostage’ in Fresh GOP Showdown (msn.com)

Kash’s Corner: How Biden’s ‘Off-Limits’ List for Russian Cyberattacks Will Backfire (theepochtimes.com)

Fauci points to WRONG ARM to show he has soreness in it after supposedly getting the vaccine. – Bing video

Trump on “Strange” Biden Press Conference: “He Got Softballs… It Was Like A Different World” | Video

Posted By Tim Hains
On Date March 26, 2021
Who brought critical race theory to America: 

Politicians want you to believe 80% of white people don’t want to acknowledge they’re racist or at least are complicit in racist institutions. Sounds about right!!! And every joint and drug any man has enjoyed has helped fuel the drug wars and cartels which affects Hispanics and indigenous people feel every day. Every time you enjoy chicken you’re helping the chicken farming industry ruthlessly farm hens. Comfort is oppressive.
An easier way to say this is that 58% of Americans hold an unfavorable view of Black people. No, let me help you. 58% of Americans don’t want their children brainwashed into being taught racist white hating ideologies. Real question. May I ask if you believe that in the past 500 years. Have white people not harmed other races at a disproportionate rate compared to other races? And if so, do you believe that there isn’t justification for the consequences of those past actions?

We don’t need CRT to understand white rage and why white people behave like animals toward their own kind and other races. So now we have black people committing a disproportionate amount of the violent crime in the US. Or just like wouldn’t we hold you responsible for the own actions insta of your (grand)father. Should you be held responsible for that?
While 58% of Americans don’t know what CRT is & don’t have the intellectual curiosity to find out AND that it’s way too advanced for children to comprehend. But, it’s the new Liberal “Willie Horton ” boogeyman intended to rile things up to turn out the black vote in 2022. Sad.
Which is the reason the left pushes it. Except real soon it will be federally mandated. We will see 3 flags on the pole. Guess which ones ?Breaking 911 baits its republican lunatic followers into believing the legitimacy of a poll when the sample size is incredibly small. but that won’t stop them from believing only what they want to believe…

Ah yes the next chapter in the culture war brought to us by DEMOCRATS. Critical race theory ( CRT) is a framework in jurisprudence that examines society and culture as they relate to categorizations of race, law, and power in the United States of America. It began as a movement in American law schools in the mid- to late 1980s as a reworking of critical legal theory on race issues.
In state houses across the country, Republican lawmakers are pushing to restrict how race is taught in classrooms. At least 22 states have proposed such bills, and they’ve already passed in five. Politicians now often call this type of legislation a ban on, quote, “critical race theory,” which has actual scholars of critical race theory frustrated.

Do you guys realize that CRT is only taught in high level college law classes? This is manufactured outrage trying to convince you guys that kids are being taught to hate America and you’re eating it up s.m.h. You know you’ve got a bad argument when 58% of Americans oppose your ideology. you’re doubling down stop just claiming nobody knows what it is, people know racism when they hear it.
Maybe Americans just don’t want their children brainwashed into prejudice and hating one another. #walkinlove

The Systems Thinking View of Simple, Complicated, Chaotic, and Complex – Net Objectives Portal

MAK£that95%becauseTRUMPvotersD0notAN§W£Rpolls…}

D0notTRU$Tpolsters…}HAT£criticalRA€theory…}HAT£beingLI£Dabout…}

D0N’TtrustM$M…}L0V£ourH1§T0R¥…}AR£tolerant…}L0V£ourR£PUBL1€…}

L0V£ourD1V£R§£¥…loveF£LL0W citizens…}G£Tit?!?!?!?!?!?!MAGA
LSSC12 : Decentralizing Control: How Aligned Initiative Conquers Uncertainty – Reinertsen on Vimeo

A Grateful Heart is a Happy Heart but this is the rule that really matters in life, the 95/5 rule.

I know, you think I’m bad at math and got the Pareto Principle (80/20 rule) wrong,

It’s the People, Not the System

by Pawel Brodzinski

When I first learned about D. Edwards Deming’s idea that 95% of performance should be addressed to the system and only 5% to the people it seemed totally counter-intuitive to me. Not even the idea itself, but its consequences. I mean a simple thought that you can basically stop working individually with the people on their performance as it just doesn’t make any sense. The impact of suboptimal system improvements should be tenfold or better than the best possible people-related changes.

Then, after researching the subject a bit, I swayed to the other side. The examples shared by Deming or Eli Goldratt are undeniable. I can also find a lot of examples from my own experience how the system was impacting performance heavily. Not that I had the numbers, but it resonated well with me.

Now, finally, you know what I think? Both approaches are crap.

Yeah, I’ve just tried to piss off both: guys who strongly believe in Deming’s work and those who totally disagree with him with a single attempt.

What Deming Really Said

I guess this story started when I was looking for Deming’s quote on one occasion. It seems that the meaning people attach to his words wasn’t there initially. The original 95/5 thingy was not about performance literally but about variability in performance.

Let me use a sports analogy to explain that. Let’s take a basketball player. If he scores anything between 5 and 30 points a game, and neither extreme is an extraordinarily good or an extraordinarily bad game for him (meaning: it happens on occasions) , variability of his performance is high. As a comparison we can have another guy, a second-tier player, who regularly scores anything between 0 and 5 points. Variability of his performance is significantly lower, even though his average performance is significantly worse.

Now, it’s not a surprise that the system governs variability. I mean, the more repeatable the situation the less variability you can expect. If the team plays are consequently set to create situations for one player his performances will be sort of repeatable. He won’t be suddenly disappearing from the game. At the same the system also governs variability of performances of a role-player who joins the game only under special circumstances, e.g. when the team needs more three-pointers or maybe when one of important players is injured. Variability of performances of such a player will be significantly bigger.

Of course, to some point, the system also governs performance itself. Think what happens when the star sits on the bench throughout the whole game or when a guy who is typically a sub plays the whole game. It doesn’t mean, however, that you tell a third-tier player to substitute a team leader and expect them to score 30 points a game. It’s not going to happen in a consistent manner. (For basketball fans: yes, I know Jeremy Lin’s story, but that’s an exception.)

What Deming was talking about was basically that the system governance is responsible for creating a stable and repetitive environment so people’s performances are controllable. Again, it’s not about how exactly people perform, but how their performance varies from day to day.

In fact, the above statement is mostly an interpretation too. Deming was talking about the system being, or not being, in statistical control which isn’t exactly performance variability, but for the sake of this argument let’s leave it as it is and not complicate things even further.

Anyway, Deming Is Still Wrong

So far I made an attempt to convince you that: first, Deming was basically talking about performance variability and second, the impact of the system on performance itself, while existent, isn’t anywhere close to 95%.

However, we shouldn’t forget Deming’s background, which is a factory floor. In other words it’s a place where workers are supposed to produce the same things in a repeatable manner. I could exploit the basketball analogy further by pointing that every game, heck, every play is different, but I guess in software development we simply don’t need that analogy anymore. It’s enough to ask: how many times have you built exactly the same feature?

And for all three of you who accidentally had this chance: how many times have you built the feature a second time in exactly the same way you did the first?

I bring this argument to show that in knowledge work, or sports, we naturally have significantly higher variability to deal with. And, unlike on a shop floor, that is good. What’s more, there is a different value attached to every single thing we develop. In fact, it’s even worse than that. Very often we don’t know exactly what value is attached to a work item we’re going to build.

This means that in such a situation we should use a very different statistical mechanism than Deming based on. We need to take into account both expected cost and expected payoff. The latter, naturally, isn’t taken into consideration on a shop floor as in this situation payoff for each part is well known. In knowledge work, on the other hand, payoff function is extremely important and never flat.

Coming back to the basketball analogy: if you wanted to bet which player is going to score 30+ points during the next game would you rather choose this reliable guy who averages 15.0 and who always scores double-figure but rarely, if ever, exceeds 20.0 or rather that crazy shooter who (surprise, surprise) averages 15.0 as well but, depending on a day, can score either nothing or 40+ points? Bravo! You’ve just chosen higher variability, which is totally against what Deming taught us.

This is because you’ve taken the payoff into account. In the former case any payoff is almost impossible as, because of low variability, it’s highly unlikely that the guy is going to score 30+ points. The other case is a different story though.

Now, especially when we think about product development we are in a betting business. We bet that this or that feature will bring a ton of new users or a truckload of money. We can’t ignore the payoff function. We can’t assume the payoff function is flat. In either case we’d be throwing the baby out with the bathwater.

Besides, Who Does Create the System?

I’m not done yet. I don’t challenge the idea that the system affects performance. I simply challenge the so-called 95/5 rule or, to be more precise, I challenge the way some people interpret the so-called 95/5 rule.

The question we should be asking is who (co-)creates the system. If we start with Deming he points to shaping the system as a management responsibility. This is probably very true on a factory floor. We are not at the factory floor though.

Let’s stay for a moment within the software development perspective and think what exactly an equivalent of a production line is.

Obviously, one part would be organizational culture. What are general ways things are done in the organization? Does the org use a lean / agile or rather a heavy-weight, formalized approach? How do your clients act? These general rules will be difficult to change.

However, when we consider a lower level it’s a different game. Let’s try to translate low-level manufacturing processes to software development. Production line would likely be a sort of a process: analysis, coding, testing, deployment, etc. What’s interesting though is what is happening on each of these stations. How exactly is the work done? Who makes decisions on how the work is done?

Take coding for example. Who decides whether unit tests are there or not? How many of them? What kind of tests? Who decides on a specific coding style? A manager? Um, no, not really. Most, or even every, of those decisions are made by a coder – a worker.

Now, the important question: do such decisions define the system which a developer operates in? Obviously! Just think what is going to be the outcome of the work of a cowboy coder and what happens when a worker is an eXtreme Programming fan. These are different systems indeed.

The conclusion of this story is that in our world workers can influence the system heavily, thus completely changing Deming’s equation.

One might point out that leaving people free and empowering them is still the part of the system design which is still the management job. I’d disagree. One thing is that adopting a technique or a practice isn’t comparable to moving the machines on a factory floor. I can perfectly start writing unit tests and it doesn’t instantly require everyone else to change the way they work.

Another thing is that it’s way easier to be a Grace Hopper follower in our industry. We can easily change the part of the system that goes through our desks, no matter whether we are empowered to do so or not. Eventually, if anyone notices (which isn’t that obvious by the way) we should have enough information to have meaningful discussion about the impact of how we’ve done our work.

All in all, in knowledge work there’s no clear line that separates the system from the people, thus the whole notion of addressing a specific part of influence to one or the other is flawed.

It’s the People, Stupid!

The last piece of this puzzle is a story. Not that long ago I joined the organization that is exceptional when compared to its surroundings. I’m far from saying that it is a perfect system already, but it’s definitely the most mature company that I’ve ever been working with.

In fact, it’s not only the maturity of the software development process we have but also this touchy-feely stuff we call the atmosphere. Not a dream job (yet) but pretty damn close to it when compared to everything else I’ve had a chance to experience.

Let’s try to translate this to a system definition then. It would be pretty effective. It would be delivering high-quality stuff. It would be a great environment to work at. It would help everyone to grow. How could one possibly not like it?

The only problem is that I’ve lost one third of technical stuff over the course of a few months. The system? No, the people! Their individual needs, frustrations and dreams. Their unique contributions to what the system is, or has been.

Because at the end of the day, in our world, the system is not machinery with replaceable humanoid parts; it is inseparably connected with the people who operate within the system. Change a single person and the whole system is different. Suddenly the rules of the game have changed and everyone else operates in a very different system. And the only thing that has changed is a single person has left.

Summary:

My message in all that is that we should first understand our work, how it gets done and what kind of system we operate in. Because when we think about that it becomes obvious that there’s no simple way of separating the people from the system in the knowledge work domain, especially when we’re talking about a small scale, e.g. dozens of people, not thousands of them.

At the same time I’m challenging the common notion of Deming’s rule because it’s nothing close to what Deming really said and it is simply flawed in our domain anyway.

At the end of the day you should understand the system (obviously!) but focus on the people too if you want a significant change.

Of course one must focus on people, because the “system” in this context is a “social system” and a “cultural system” more than a “system of (manufacturing) processes” — even though some still like to see and present it as such, for various reasons.

Don’t Judge until you spend a day in their shoes. A Democracy only last 250 years

We are a CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC 1A 2A #NRA #USCCA #MAGA..

 People will come & go in your life. HOWEVER, THE ones who STAY…touches ur Heart R True friends    -whether near or far  

Kamala Harris visiting border – but avoiding devastation White House caused?
US COVID-19 Vaccine Progress Tracker | Vaccinations by State | USAFacts
This Is the City With the Fewest COVID-19 Cases (msn.com)
The New Middle East emerges in the Knesset (msn.com)

CAMERA OPPORTUNITY 

Your Time IS Much appreciated

Sights Of Sara (@Sightsofsara) / Twitter

Sights Of Sara – YouTube

Rising seas will likely spark mass migration and eventually force whole cities to be abandoned   Chemtrails – Bing

Spraying Heavy Chemtrails Ohio | Indiana border – Bing

Mysterious disease killing birds in Ohio, public asked to remove feeders here in Ohio Thursday, June 24th 2021, 10:47 AM EDT
By Madison Tromler WFMJ

What is the birds and the bees about.

A mysterious disease in birds wildlife experts said they have not seen before, is here in Ohio. The illness is killing birds within a day and officials ask people to take caution.

The unknown disease is causing death in birds in mostly Central Ohio and some other surrounding states, but the Ohio Wildlife Center said they have seen a small number of birds with the disease in Northeast Ohio, too.

Wildlife experts said they’re seeing the disease in mostly songbirds, such as blue jays and robins among others. “The presenter is usually finding them on the ground… their eyes are crusty or like caked together,” Ohio Wildlife Center Interim Executive Director Stormy Gibson said, “Sometimes their eyes look clear and they have neurological symptoms which means they might have a head tilt.” The disease is also causing blindness in birds. The Ohio Wildlife Center and Ohio Department of Natural Resources Division of Wildlife is asking the public to take down their outdoor bird feeders for the next week or two.
“The reason that is is number one, we want to try to stop birds from congregating together, whether we know that works or not… we don’t know,” Gibson said, “But we’re trying to help save our population of birds.” Gibson also said people should clean out their bird feeders and baths as well, properly dispose of a bird if someone finds one and report the finding online at WildOhio.gov.

“If the animal is already deceased, the Division of Wildlife is recommending to double bag it, wear gloves and a form of protection, and put it in the trash,” Gibson said. ODNR Division of Wildlife Communications Specialist Jamey Emmert said they’re conducting tests on the birds and working with wildlife experts on a national level, but right now there are more questions than answers.
The Ohio Wildlife Center said they believe the disease will likely continue to spread in birds throughout the state. “Birdwatchers are seeing this, local backyard folks are seeing it, and we’re seeing it in both urban areas and suburban areas and even our rural areas,” Gibson said, “they’re unsure whether the disease could harm humans or pets, so they suggest keeping pets away and not touching a bird without proper protective gear.
If you find a bird with this disease that may be alive, you’re asked to contact a local wildlife rehabilitator at OWRA.org. The Ohio Wildlife Center said they suspect more information on the disease will come next week.
Severe climate impacts will unavoidably ravage nature and humankind by mid-century or sooner, according to the draft of a landmark report from the UN’s climate science advisory. – AFP pic, June 24, 2021

Reflecting on#Karma what goes around comes around ten fold

Coastal cities face their mortality on the climate frontline – video  – images

Domination of the seas allowed many coastal cities to become trading powerhouses and cultural melting pots. But now that strength is becoming a liability as climate change swells the oceans, redrawing the map and putting hundreds of millions at risk. That’s the warning of an unpublished draft report by the UN’s climate science advisory panel, seen exclusively by AFP, which outlines the vast and urgent climate threats facing the planet.

From the air, you can see the problem.

In city upon city, office towers, warehouses and homes crowd the water’s edge as if they are jostling to take a dip, major roads hug the shore, landing strips jut dauntlessly into the frothing waves. These cities are on the “frontline”, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report says. “Difficult choices will need to be made as sea level continues to rise, floods and storm surges become more frequent and intense, warming increases ocean acidity and intensifies heatwaves,” it adds.

Rising seas will likely spark mass migration and eventually force whole cities to be abandoned to the flood. But profound consequences for megacities, small islands, arctic communities and deltas will come long before that – well within the lifetimes of most alive today.

Vast floods in Thailand in 2011 inundated manufacturing centres,

In some places, people already know all too well the destructive power of water. “I once was a bride of an affluent family,” Yasmin Begum tells AFP in the bare corrugated metal hut she now shares with her relatives in the Bangladesh capital Dhaka.

“My in-laws and parents, they had everything – cattle, nice house, farmland. But the river took it all away.”

The family had lived a relatively prosperous life in the southern island district of Bhola, an exposed tendril of land at the outer limits of one of the world’s most populated deltas. Then one night 12 years ago, the raging Meghna river devoured everything they had.

Begum, now 30 and a mother of three, scratches a living as a Dhaka housekeeper, while her husband drives a cycle rickshaw through the city’s steamy streets. They escaped one flood only to be at risk of another: Their new home, in one of the narrow-alley slums clustered precariously close to a flood barrier, is just metres from the riverbank.

Storm damage on the Atlantic Coast after Hurricane Sandy in 2012.

Hurricane List Wikipedia – tornado frequency by year.

‘Mortal’ cities

Roughly a tenth of the world’s population and assets are based less than 10 metres above sea level. “Structurally, a lot of cities are set up in almost the exact wrong place for a world with rising seas,” says Ben Strauss, CEO and chief scientist at Climate Central. Ports and airports are built on the very flattest, lowest land possible.

“Sea level used to be stable,” Strauss explains. “Not anymore.”

Land currently home to 300 million people will be vulnerable to annual flooding by 2050, according to his research. Those least able to afford to protect themselves will likely be hit hardest.

All urban areas are increasingly stifled by air pollution and extreme heat, but those at the coasts are also deluged by flooding intensified by the rising water level and lashed by storms whipped into greater fury by warmer seas.

Saltwater washes across agricultural fields and rice paddies, while ecosystems – crucial for economies, cultures and climate protection – are gravely degraded by human activities. Cities like Venice and Jakarta are also sinking, while low-lying island nations, particularly in the Pacific, are at risk of disappearing under the waves.

The report says slashing emissions now can reduce the risks.

“But the sea-level rise is accelerating and will continue for millennia,” it says.

Greenhouse gas emissions are locking in global heating that is melting ice sheets and glaciers and expanding oceans. The greenhouse gases already in the air have essentially baked in the amount that waters will rise until around 2050. By 2100, the IPCC has predicted water levels could be 60 centimetres (24 inches) higher, even if global warming is limited to well below two degrees Celsius — the cornerstone target of the 2015 Paris Agreement.

Longer term, it says, the prospects for many coastal cities are “dismal” without deep cuts to emissions. Meanwhile, humanity continues to pump pollution into the atmosphere, locking in global heating that is melting ice sheets and glaciers and expanding oceans. In just a few decades we may have emitted enough to eventually drown some of the world’s great cities, Strauss says.

By 2050, an at-risk region like South Florida might have developed a multi-decade plan to “empty out”, he says.

“We live our lives knowing we’re going to die, but I don’t think we often think of our cities in those terms,” he tells AFP.

“Most of our coastal cities are mortal. A lot of them will end in flood in the long run.”

Dhaka faces ‘severe escalating risk’ from climate change, the IPCC report says.

Cascading risk

Costs are already rising.

In October 2012, Hurricane Sandy slammed into the coast around New York and New Jersey, killing scores of people and causing tens of billions of dollars in damages. The storm caused “cascading” impacts, the IPCC says, triggering massive power outages and disrupting water and communication links for hundreds of thousands of people.

Disasters like this in globalised coastal cities pose “risks for societies and the global economy in general”, the report says. A worst-case scenario projection for the world’s 136 largest coastal cities calculated expected damages by mid-century of between US$1.6 to US$3.2 trillion from sea-level rise without adaptation.

There were wide variations between cities, partly because of where assets and people are concentrated, study co-author Elisa Sainz de Murieta of the Basque Centre for Climate Change said. Guangzhou was top of the list, with damages calculated at around $330 billion by 2050 under a pessimistic emissions scenario without adaptation, and nearly US$1.4 trillion in 2100.

In second place was Mumbai, which the IPCC report describes as a “non-adapter” – with little done to prepare people and property for disaster – despite predictions that swathes of built-up area could be flood-prone by 2100. And cities continue to expand, putting millions more in harm’s way, particularly in Asia and Africa.

The costs of climate and weather disasters are already rising steeply.

Lessons from the ‘bathtub’

How can cities protect themselves?

Options include engineered protections like dykes and seawalls, which could cut flood risk for up to a few metres of sea rise but can damage environmental systems.

Rehabilitating coastal ecosystems also offers broad benefits.

Storm surges kill fewer people and cause less damage when a coastal city is sheltered behind a wide buffer of mangroves or marshes.

Seagrass meadows, mangrove forests, coral reefs and tidal marshes also support marine life and related economic sectors like fisheries and tourism. There is “no silver bullet”, the IPCC draft says, but the choices will only get tougher as the impacts stack up. “We have to act now, because we are already too late,” says Johan Verlinde, programme manager for Rotterdam’s Climate Adaptation Plan.

More than half of the Netherlands is vulnerable to large-scale coastal and river flooding and over a quarter is below sea level. After deadly inundations in 1953 the country set about building a network of high-tech defences. The Netherlands currently allocates €1 billion (RM5 billion) a year for its “living with water” adaptation plan.

Rotterdam’s assortment of floating infrastructure includes a cattle farm. With 85% below sea level, Verlinde says the city is “really a bathtub”. “Every drop of water that falls on our city, we need to pump it up. We really need to be innovative to keep our feet dry,” he says. Dutch engineers travel the world sharing their flood resilience expertise, although many poorer countries and communities cannot afford the most effective big infrastructure defences.

The reasons why some are protected & others do not go far beyond national budgets

‘Sink or swim’

Cape Town is an “extensive adapter”, according to the IPCC, with flood protection infrastructure, as well as early warning systems in place. But almost 100,000 households are exposed to flooding in a city riven by deep poverty and the legacy of apartheid. Toward the coast, the serene Lake Michelle is a high-end housing complex enfolded within a secure perimeter fence.

Outside a scrubby strip of land separates it from Masiphumelele, where ramshackle informal homes blanket the waterlogged ground. The contrast is an example of the stark inequalities that make finding consensus on a response to climate change much more difficult, says Anton Cartwright of the African Centre for Cities.

“Ultimately we’re all going to have to sink or swim – literally in this instance – together,” he says.

Saint Mark’s square in Venice is waterlogged ~  

‘Die by drowning’

In the end, even the most innovative, big-spending adapters may not be able to avoid the ultimate solution: retreat.

Indonesia has already put together plans to shift its capital to Borneo from subsidence-wracked Jakarta.

In Bangladesh, climate-related migration has already started. But this is just the beginning.

Studies predict sea-level rise could displace nearly a million people in the country by 2050, and more than two million by the end of the century.

Dhaka will likely be a destination for those driven from their homes in other low-lying coastal areas. But the delta city, where almost 40% of people live in vulnerable informal settlements, is itself expected to face increasing inundations. As simple as their rented house is, Begum says they cannot afford to lose it – her family has nowhere to retreat to. “Then probably we’ll have to die by drowning,” she tells AFP. “We have no other option.”

Like Begum, some communities will be unable or unwilling to move even if their homes are at risk.

And some places are irreplaceable.

Flooding threatens key infrastructure like this airport in bangkok, deluged in 2011

‘Queen of the Seas’

Unesco describes Venice as an “extraordinary architectural masterpiece” where even the smallest buildings contain works by some of the world’s great artists, such as Titian and Tintoretto. The city was founded in the 5th century, although it was not until the 10th century that the “Queen of the Seas” became a major maritime power.

Today, Venice is the most threatened world heritage site in the Mediterranean. Over 90% of the city is vulnerable to flooding.

Venice has installed mobile barriers to close lagoon inlets during storm surges. But if sea levels rise 30cm, floodwaters could slosh around the palazzi for several weeks. At 75cm, they could linger for six months.The IPCC’s most pessimistic prediction for 2100 is 1.1 metres. Oceanographer Georg Umgiesser says because of the effects of subsidence, even half a metre would be “catastrophic” for the city.

St Mark’s Square would never be dry.

And Venice is not alone – up to 140 world heritage sites are at risk of coastal flooding even at two degrees Celsius of global warming, mostly in the Mediterranean.

What we’ve lost

Humans have told stories about cities and civilisations swallowed by the sea for centuries. In the past, there was no evidence linking behaviour to the deluge, but now our choices are creating real Atlantises of the future, says Strauss. “Our efforts to stop climate change are to protect the lives that we have today, but also they are going to shape the stories that our descendants tell about us,” Strauss says.

“And I think there will be a lot of stories about what we’ve lost, about the things we failed to protect.” – AFP, June 24, 2021

Dueling heat waves are baking the East and West Coasts. One is going to be worse than the other (msn.com)

If You Live in These States, Never Go in the Ocean When It’s Calm (msn.com)

This Odisha microbiologist leads by example in fight against COVID-19 | Sambad English

Climate.Change.Ade.on.the.Frontline S01E01 – Bing video How climate change has affected each state – Bing video

How climate change has affected each state (msn.com)

How Climate Change Has Affected Each State | Stacker

If You Have a Right to Burn My Flag

(Then I Have a Right to Kick Your Ass) – YouTube · Creed Fisher

Which suggested that organisms best adjusted to their environment are the most successful in succeeding. “Survival of the fittest” is a phrase that originated from Darwinian evolutionary theory as a way of describing the mechanism of natural selection. The biological concept of fitness is defined as reproductive success. In Darwinian terms the phrase is best understood as “Survival of the form that will leave the most copies of itself in successive generations.” The continued existence of organisms which are best adapted to their environment, with the extinction of others, as a concept in the Darwinian theory of evolution.

Compare with natural selection.

The belief that only the people with a strong desire to succeed and the ability to change as conditions change will achieve success: Lodewicus Theodorus “Louis” Oosthuizen is a South African professional golfer who won the 2010 Open Championship. He also holds the distinction of having finished runner-up in all four major championships: the 2012 Masters Tournament, the 2015 and 2021 U.S. Open, the 2015 Open Championship, and the PGA Championship in 2017 and 2021. He is one of eight golfers to accomplish this feat, joining Craig Wood, Jack Nicklaus, Arnold Palmer, Tom Watson, Greg Norman, Phil Mickelson, and Dustin Johnson. His highest placing on the Official World Golf Ranking is fourth, which he reached in January 2013.

I love Louie’s demeanor on the course. He’s so calm and polite.

He would be a good guy to pair with. I also Love his swing and he’s a consistent putter too.
Louie has a perfect swing and still hits shitty shots. He has perfect rhythm, not a perfect swing. There’s no hope for the rest of us… 3 times in contention on the final day this year and falls apart .
Louie has been in contention on the final day 3 times this year. He is the only player in the top 8 that hasn’t shot under par today, otherwise he would have won or had a play-off . He’s a bag of nerves and a bottle job !! They don’t paint pictures on score cards. It’s not how it’s how many. Nicklaus said Tom Weiskopf  had the perfect swing.

The Golden Bear won more majors. You know that this game is won between the ears too. The top 8 all shot under par on the final day . Not concerned about day 3 . My point is, he’s been a wuss on day 4 . Top 8 entering Sunday and they shot final round Henley 73 …Hughes…77……Bryson…..77…..McIlroy ….73..….. Scheffler….73…….Wollf ….74 !!!

Rahm’s putting on the last two holes was incredible. That put the pressure on Louie….. Top Golfers All time:  I’m tired of hearing how great his swing is. It’s got great tempo and balance, but it’s not a perfect swing. He struggles with his hips moving into the ball just like the rest of us. I guess you never heard the old saying about the golf pro with the million dollar swing and 10 cent head. I’ve seen a million of them everywhere. At the end of the day all we can do is shoot our shot.. That’s the beauty of the swing; its two parts-technique and tempo. 2nd one is sooo hard to keep when shoulders get tight and we try to steer it.

Dr Bob Rotella said it best…golf is not a game of perfection. 

He has to be extremely wealthy at this point, and his tips have helped my golf swing tremendously. As we golfers know, it’s not really about the great shots you hit …it’s the number of average ones you get away with that makes the most difference. Speak for yourself. I have an awful swing and still hit a few decent shots. There’s hope for us all. Perfect swing if he finishes his backswing. Got too quick and pulled it like his coach says.
It’s a toss up between best looking swings Louis Oosthuizen golf swing – Bing video and Tom Lewis golf swing – Bing video

However, TL hasn’t had even near the success of LOUIE. Rory has The smoothest swing on tour…. That swing is butter!!! I was there Thursday. It was humbling to watch how good those swings are and still yell fore and hit trees. Shit it is not easy! You still have to aim them correctly.

I’m not sure his target off the tee on 17, but I bet it was too far left.

The decade line in golf swing – was at the right bunkers.

Thought this exact thing when he hit it in the barranca. Also I fucking love your attitude. You take sooo much Shit IN STRIDE. Plus you can shoot in the 60s at Torrey. Matt Wolf golf swing video and Louis prove that any swing can lose… Then there are those with * jIM Furyk golf swing – video laughs * imperfect swing OR (1) Nick Price ARC swing slow motion  versus (1) Fred Couples Lever golf swing who hit good shots. Weird game 80% between the ears…. The most important shots in golf require little “swing” in th3 short game.
Picking on one of the most beloved players on tour ain’t cool. He is human like the rest of us, as is Bryson, Phil, JT, Jordan, Rory,.. We all suck sometimes, at golf that is. He’s a great example of being disappointed as a competitor but not mentally tortured…he may have a few more chances to hit some shitty shots… You know I think we can call this Meltdown Sunday. It wasn’t just Louie …Bryson.

He’s too nice. I know that sounds stupid but he doesn’t have that killer instinct and it showed up big time today. But it could have been my fault. I put a bet on him after the 13th hole and I am good at picking losers. Trust the swing, just release the club head & see what happens. Do it again and again, that’s golf. Between the ears is where the perfect golf swing lives to get the job done if your shitty shots are away from the trouble, you’ve got a chance. Paige Spiranac (@PaigeSpiranac) / Twitter

Paige Spiranac’s Fresh Perspective On Golf Has Earned Her Lots Of Fans.

Paige Renee Spiranac – Wikipedia (born March 26, 1993) is an American social media personality and former professional golfer. She played college golf at both the University of Arizona and San Diego State University, winning All-Mountain West Conference honors during the 2012–13 and 2013–14 seasons, and leading the Aztecs to their first Mountain West Conference Championship in 2015.^[1]

Spiranac – Wikipedia first played professionally in December 2015, joined the developmental Cactus Tour in May 2016, earning her first and only win in June when she defeated an amateur golfer at Scottsdale’s Orange Tree Country Club.^[2] In August, Spiranac failed in her attempt to qualify for a card to play on the professional LPGA circuit, and she retired from professional golf in December 2016.  Paige Spiranac – Wikipedia

After initially creating her social media accounts to post trick-shot videos,^[2] Spiranac had more than 2 million followers on Instagram by 2018.^[3]
(1) Paige Spiranac’s Fresh Perspective On Golf has been playing the game since childhood, but only recently has she been getting a lot of attention.After an article was written about her, Paige’s social media following went from a few thousand to a few hundred thousand, virtually overnight. That’s a lot of new golf fans! Keep reading to learn more about this athlete’s story and how she’s attracting people to the world of golf.
Paige Spiranac Has Been Playing Golf All Her Life.

Like many kids, Paige Spiranac played a few different sports as a young girl, including golf. The game became such an infatuation for the athlete that her friends and family weren’t surprised when she went on to play at the collegiate level.
She competed on the women’s golf team at the University of Arizona and San Diego State University. While playing in college, Paige did exceptionally well, winning various championships and titles.
(1) Paige didn’t grow up wanting to play golf.
She was interested in another sport altogether. Keep reading to find out which!
Paige Spiranac: Winning at the collegiate level.From the 2012 through the 2014 seasons, Paige brought home the All-Mountain West Conference title for San Diego State University. She also went on to help the Aztecs women’s golf team win their first-ever Mountain West Conference title. Even so, the women’s golf community is small. She didn’t necessarily get a lot of attention. That is until she started doing something very specific on social media. Then, Paige was getting a boatload of attention!
She learned the power of social media early on in her career.
Social Media And (1) Paige Spiranac doingTrick Shots.While in school, Paige began to use her social media accounts, specifically Instagram, to post videos of her performing various trick shots. The short clips gained her a huge audience, something she wasn’t expecting at all! Her following is so large, over two million, that she is technically considered a social media personality. That’s not too bad at all for an athlete who posted some videos just for fun.

What was next for Paige?
Life After College And A Championship Win

Of course, her time in college had to come to an end. In July of 2015, people finally saw Paige away from the Aztecs and on her own, playing in the Colorado Women’s Golf Association Match Play Championship. After her 35-hole title match against Brittany Fan of the University of Colorado Boulder, Paige was able to snag the win with nine holes under par. This is the same year, Paige began to get quite the following.

Next: why she gave up her first sport of choice.

She Grew Up A Gymnast

 Golf sensation Paige Spiranac’s worst injuries ever – including vile detached nail

When she was growing up, Paige had huge dreams of becoming an Olympic gymnast. 

At a young age, she was even invited to train at the Karolyi Ranch. However, the universe had other plans for the young girl… big plans. 

Paige Spiranac broke her kneecap not once, but twice during training. 

Sadly, Paige was also bullied by peers for her Olympic dreams.

Both events had her quitting before she made it to the podium.

Starting Off Her Career With Five Titles – Bing video

Paige Starting Off Her Career With Five Titles  It’s safe to say it didn’t take long for Paige to become a master of the sport. Just starting off, the young girl won five titles in the Colorado junior golf circuit. Then, in 2010, she went on to win the Connecticut Women’s Golf Association Junior Stroke Playback. This was just the beginning of Paige’s long and successful golfing career, though. Next, the young player was headed off to college, where she was going to make waves!

Next: find out how much her first professional prize was worth.

2016: The Year She Turned Pro

While Paige was gaining a huge following as an amateur golfer, 2016 brought a whole different can of worms. It was the year Paige could finally call herself a professional golfer, after coming in 9th at the CoBank Colorado Women’s Open. Along with being able to leave the course calling herself a pro, Paige also walked away with a prize of $1,750! It’s not nearly as much as seasoned professionals make at the end of a win, but it’s a start.

Next: Paige attended two different colleges… Do you know which ones?

Heading To College

Considering all of the titles and championships she won as a junior player, it’s not hard to imagine all of the schools wanting to recruit Paige. One of these schools was the University of Arizona, where she earned a scholarship. Although she didn’t stay with the Arizona Wildcats for the duration of her college career, Paige sure did make it known that she was a contender on the course, even as a freshman.

Unfortunately, the University of Arizona wasn’t a fit for Paige, so she transferred to another school.

That’s coming up next. She Shot A Personal Best of 73

While Paige played as a freshman for the Arizona Wildcats during the 2011-2012 season, she shot a personal best of 73, twice! More remarkably, she was able to shoot that score twice when she only played in three events. But the school wasn’t a good fit. And after her first year, Paige decided she wanted a change of scenery. So, she uprooted herself from Arizona and moved to southern California and San Diego State University.

How’d she do in San Diego? You’re about to find out.

San Diego State University Proved To Be The Right Move For Paige.

As it so happens, the transfer was the right move for the student-athlete. During the 2012-2013 season, Paige obtained sixth-place Mountain West Championship honors, the 19th finish during the NCAA Central Regional Championships, First-Team All-Mountain West honors, and fifth-place Cal Classic honors. Not too bad for her first year on the women’s team at San Diego State! And that was only her second year in college. This golfer was just starting to show what she was made of. Paige Was Second-Team All-Mountain West Honors

After a stellar 2012-2013 season, people were excited to see what Paige was going to bring to the team as a junior during the 2013-2014 season. As it turned out, she didn’t disappoint. As an upperclassman, Paige went on to achieve Second-Team All-Mountain West Honors as well as a top ten finish at the Mountain West Championship. It’s safe to say Paige had a very bright golf career ahead of her after college.

Next: one of the happiest moments of Paige’s life.

Senior Year: Winning The Mountain West Conference Championship Title  (1) paige spiranac NCAA.

Of course, after three amazing years playing at the collegiate level, it only makes sense that Paige’s college golfing career went out with a bang. During her final season playing with the San Diego State University women’s golf team, Paige helped lady Aztecs win their first-ever Mountain West Conference Championship title.  – Bing    ncaa – Bing video 

According to Paige, winning the title was “one of the absolute happiest moments of my life.” Ironically, the title was just the start of Paige’s career.

Of course, Paige’s fanbase was growing with each of her achievements.

Look: Paige Spiranac Celebrates Major Career Achievement (thespun.com)

Paige Spiranac Shameless Photos – Bing video

In 2015, Paige began to see a huge uptick in her social media followers.

Who does she have to thank for the exposure, you might ask?

The follower explosion is all in thanks to a Total Frat Move article that encouraged people to check out the golfer. In just two days, the number of followers on Paige’s Instagram account went from being under 10,000 to 100,000.

 How Paige Spiranac became golf’s sex symbol — and pissed off the pros (nypost.com)

While the golfer has only one win under her belt as a pro, she is still a huge social media personality and one of the main faces for women’s golf.

Aside from Paige Spiranac  (@paigespiranac_) Instagram, people also follow Paige Spiranac (@PaigeSpiranac) / Twitter. The athlete actually uses the platform       to help promote some of her other business ventures, including her podcast. One of her tweets said, “Idk if you heard, but I have a podcast. Playing A Round With Paige Renee on Apple Podcasts …

A golf podcast… So yeah, please listen. I’d very much appreciate that!”       Paige Spiranac’s career – Bing

You might not believe this next fact about Paige.

Ironically, She’s Camera Shy

While she is very active on social media, promoting the sport, her podcast, and teaching various tips and tricks of golf, Paige is ironically very camera shy. To get over her fear, Paige actually went as far as launching her own YouTube channel. She wanted to get over the fear of sharing her thoughts with strangers over the internet. And considering she very much enjoys talking about golf and helping people with their game, it was definitely something she had to get over!

CyberSmile And Anti-Bullying

It’s a good thing Paige was able to get over her camera fright since she uses her social media platform for more than posting selfies. Instead, Paige uses her platforms to help the greater good, such as being involved with groups like CyberSmile. This anti-bullying group is something near and dear to Paige’s heart, as she was a victim of bullying during her youth. In the group, she opens up about her experiences with bullies and low self-esteem, hoping to help someone dealing with the same thing.

 Paige Has More Than One Sponsor

In fact, CyberSmile is one of the many groups sponsoring the young professional Athlete. Paige is also sponsored by Philip Stein Watches, Mizzen + Main, Parsons Xtreme Golf, and 18Birdies. She is also under contract with Golf Digest, modeling clothing for their website. And, to answer your question, yes, the partnership and her “non-tradition golf attire” brought in a solid amount of traffic to the Golf Digest website. It might have been what put her on Sports Illustrated‘s radar!

The only thing is, she did something no other female athlete has done before. What was it?

She Was On The Cover Of Sports Illustrated!!!

While Paige has more than one sponsorship, a contract with Golf Digest, and multiple titles under her belt, one of her crowning moments was when she modeled for the cover of Sports Illustrated magazine. In 2018, Paige graced Golf Digest cover of the magazine holding her sport’s equipment, something other female athletes’ haven’t done in the past. And that’s not the only big moment that happened to Paige that year.

Paige Writes A Column For Golf Magazine

The year 2018 brought more to it than the cover of Sports Illustrated. It also brought a writing job for Paige. Yup, when she isn’t managing her multiple social media accounts or hitting balls on the course, Paige is writing a monthly column for Golf Magazine, something she personally started for the company. Of course, she is more focused on the sport and less on writing about it, but it’s nice to know she’s very much invested in her fans!

NEW podcast episode! Going solo again!

-I preview the US Open and talk about being credentialed for the first time -Nut sack vs cleavage -Is Bryson vs Brooks good for golf? And so much more so click the link to listen: ‎Playing A Round With Paige Renee: Nuts Out on Apple Podcasts

Ready to meet another amazing female athlete? Meet Allison Stokke a pole vaulter who became a social media sensation after a photo of her went viral. Paige Spiranac’s Fresh Perspective On Golf Is Gaining Her Fans.

Paige Spiranac: Instagram’s Best Known – and Most Controversial – Female Golfer (definition.org)

5 ways to beat your fear of getting older (msn.com)

These Are the Best Foods to Reduce Your Risk of Cancer, According to Science

Detox Diet Plan: How to Detoxify the Body & Reset Your Health – Dr. Axe (draxe.com)

Secret Detox Drink Recipe: Cleanse and Rejuvenate – Dr. Axe (draxe.com)