Cancer Quick Facts

Beata Halassy’s Bold Cancer Battle: A Virologist’s Unconventional Path #shorts#experiment#viralshort

Story by Daniel Wu writer – Search

This Scientist Treated Her Own Breast Cancer Using Lab-Grown Virus

When Beata Halassy learned in summer 2020 that her breast cancer had come back, she made a bold decision. As a virologist at the University of Zagreb Homepage in Croatia, she knew that researchers around the world were testing virus-based cancer treatments that could avoid the destructive side effects of conventional treatments like chemotherapy.

Halassy, who studies viruses for a living, decided to test some on herself, it worked.

With her oncologists’ approval, she made herself a test subject and worked with colleagues to inject herself with two types of viruses that she cultivated in a lab, the science journal Nature reported. Over several weeks, her homegrown remedy caused her tumor to shrink, enabling surgeons to remove it.

In a study documenting her experiment, published August in the peer-reviewed journal “Vaccines,” Halassy and her co-authors said that the “unconventional” treatment has left her in remission for almost four years.

Bioethicists told The Washington Post they were split on Halassy’s decision to enter the storied, controversial tradition of self-experimentation in medicine and publish her results. While Halassy was uniquely qualified to weigh the decision and carry out her tests on herself, she still may have lacked the perspective of an objective researcher as her own test subject, they said. And her study of just one patient isn’t likely to provide enough information to draw conclusions about the treatments she tested.

Scientist Treated Her Own Cancer with Viruses She Grew in the Lab

“From my perspective, self experimentation is not fundamentally unethical,” said Alta Charo, a professor emerita of law and bioethics at the University of Wisconsin at Madison. “It may be unwise. It may indeed be tainted by an unrealistic set of expectations.

… But I don’t see it as fundamentally unethical.”

Halassy and two of her co-authors did not respond to requests for comment, but Nature identified her as the researcher who was her own test subject. Halassy’s study describes the person treated as “a 50-year-old self-experimenting female virologist,” and she is the only person on the author list who meets that description.

Studies exploring the use of viruses to treat cancer date back over a decade. The Food and Drug Administration first approved a form of oncolytic virus therapy, the use of viruses modified to specifically attack cancer cells, to treat skin cancer in 2015. Research since then has sought to widen the range of cancers that OVT can be applied to. But clinical trials for novel treatments like OVT are sometimes limited, Halassy and her co-authors wrote in their study, by being carried out first on patients whose health may have already been affected by conventional treatments like chemotherapy or radiotherapy.

Halassy was in a different situation. She was several years removed from her breast-cancer diagnosis in 2016 and her subsequent chemotherapy. And she was a rare subject who had the means and the know-how to produce and administer her own experimental viral treatment.

Scientist cures stage 3 cancer with lab-grown viruses, experts call it unethical

Halassy and her colleagues used two types of viruses — a strain of measles used in vaccines, and vesicular stomatitis virus, which affects livestock — that she prepared in her own lab, according to the study. The viruses were injected directly into the tumor at various intervals over about six weeks.

Around 11 days into the regimen, Halassy’s tumor began to shrink and continued to diminish gradually until it was small enough to be surgically excised after the six weeks of injections ended. It was a sterling result, the study states — the treatment came with few serious side effects, save for a day when Halassy developed a fever, and enabled surgeons to remove the tumor without further growth or spread in her body.

Halassy’s breast cancer had returned twice after her 2016 diagnosis. After the viral treatment, she has been cancer-free for 45 months, the study says. With the experiment, Halassy joins a long line of researchers who have tested medical theories on themselves. Their attempts have led to significant medical breakthroughs — and in some cases, harm or death. 

Jesse Lazear, an American physician studying yellow fever in the 19th century, died of the disease after allowing himself to be bitten by a mosquito to prove how it was transmitted. Peruvian medical student Daniel Carrión died in 1885 after infecting himself with Carrión’s disease, which was later named after him.

Halassy’s self-experimentation didn’t appear to be nearly as risky as those fatal examples, said Hank Greely, the director of Stanford University’s Center for Law and the Biosciences. But he said critics might still question if a researcher in Halassy’s position could give informed consent to be a test subject and evaluate the potential benefits and harms of an experiment without bias.

“In general, it is viewed as a bad idea for physicians to take care of their [family members] or themselves, because they lack the objectivity necessary to do a good job,” Greely said. “The same thing holds for self-experimentation.”

Halassy and her co-authors wrote that the study did not undergo a review by an ethics committee because it involved self-experimentation, and that the subject was “fully aware of her illness as well as of available therapies” and “wanted to try an innovative approach in a scientifically sound way.”

Opponents of the practice also argue that publicizing cases like Halassy’s risks encouraging less qualified patients to self-experiment in more dangerous ways, said Greely and Charo, the bioethics professor. They added that Halassy’s study of her response to OVT was likely too limited in scope to contribute reliably to research on the treatment.

“Not every experiment is research,” Charo said.

Halassy and her co-authors acknowledged in the study that it was “isolated” but said it should encourage clinical trials to assess the efficacy of OVT in early stages of cancer. …. They also said the circumstances of Halassy’s study would be very difficult to repeat.

“The study was feasible only due to the unique situation in which the patient was also an expert virologist,” the study states.

John Woods · 15/11/2024

· Society Scientists of Hungarian origin can treat cancer with viruses? 

Scientist Injects Her Own Cancerous Tumor With Viruses She Grew in Lab

The miraculous recovery of Dr Beáta Halassy Dr Beáta Halassy, a virologist at the University of Zagreb, has made headlines with her extraordinary personal battle against breast cancer. When her cancer returned four years ago, she refused another gruelling round of chemotherapy. Instead, she turned to her scientific expertise to create a genetically engineered virus treatment that exposed cancerous cells to her immune system. 

The results? Four years of cancer-free living. 

Yet, despite her remarkable recovery, she continues to face scepticism from the scientific community.  No more chemotherapy Dr Beáta Halassy’s ordeal began with a stage-three breast cancer diagnosis, a life-threatening condition with a significant risk of metastasis. Following several rounds of aggressive chemotherapy and a mastectomy, her cancer returned in 2020. 

This time, she rejected conventional treatments, opting instead to rely on her decades of experience as a virologist Dr Halassy developed a “virus cocktail” that she injected directly into the tumour in her chest. Initially, the tumour grew, leaving her desperate. But after 50 days, it began to shrink, eventually becoming small enough to be surgically removed. 

How does Beáta Halassy’s virus cocktail work? 

Dr Beáta Halassy’s success lies in her innovative use of genetically engineered viruses. Combining strains of measles and vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV), her cocktail specifically targeted cancerous cells. These viruses penetrated the malignant cells, effectively “opening” them so her immune system could identify and destroy them. Crucially, the viruses replicated only within cancerous cells, leaving healthy tissue unharmed. 

  Related video: Breast Cancer Awareness: How to Reduce Risks, Stay Informed (KTNV Las Vegas, NV) – Search

Photo: PrtScr/Youtube Beáta Halassy 

Beáta Halassy giving an interview for Croatian N1 TV. – Search Videos

The experimental nature of her treatment came with significant risks. To start with the least concerning one, she could have lost valuable weeks if the treatment had failed. Additionally, there was a serious danger of developing fatal complications, such as blood clots in her lungs. Despite these risks, her oncologist agreed to monitor the process and stood ready to intervene with conventional chemotherapy if necessary. Fortunately, no such intervention was required. 

Dr Halassy has now been cancer-free for four years. 

During this time, she has worked to publish her findings and share the story of her recovery. However, gaining scientific and medical recognition has proven challenging. Ethical questions from medical journals The therapy Dr Halassy used is part of an emerging experimental field called oncolytic virotherapy (OVT). “The strain of measles she chose is widely used in childhood vaccines, and the strain of VSV induces mild influenza-like symptoms”, Daily Mail wrote. 

Medical journals initially refused to publish her results, citing ethical concerns. Critics feared that her success story might encourage cancer patients to pursue similar unregulated treatments, despite potential risks. Jacob Sherkow, a law and medical ethics researcher at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, commented on these concerns.

“Her paper, finally published in the journal Vaccines, should have addressed the ethical implications of such a treatment,” he said. Dr Beáta Halassy herself acknowledged the limitations of her approach. “Maybe they do not always work as well as other treatments, but they are certainly less destructive,” she told Uncharted Territories. Hope for a new era in cancer treatment The potential impact of Dr Halassy’s treatment is vast.

With hundreds of thousands of patients suffering from advanced cancers—such as breast, lung, prostate, and melanoma—there is an urgent need for less toxic and more effective therapies. Dr Halassy’s case provides a glimpse of what might be possible. “Breast cancer remains the most common cancer worldwide and the leading cause of cancer-related death among women, accounting for 2.3 million diagnoses and 670,000 deaths in 2022, according to the World Health Organization (WHO)”, Medical Notes wrote. 

Hungarian Roots 

While Dr Halassy’s groundbreaking work is based in Croatia, she is of Hungarian descent, a detail noted by the Hungarian outlet Ripost. Her story is not only a testament to scientific ingenuity but also to the courage and determination of one woman to rewrite the rules of her own treatment.

Laboratory of Immunochemistry and Biochemistry

Scientific Advisor
Dr. SC. Beata Halassy
Phone: +385 1 641 43 13
E-mail: beata.halassy@unizg.hr

The question now is whether regulatory authorities and the broader scientific community will embrace oncolytic virotherapy, potentially bringing this innovative approach to patients in need around the world.

Please use the sharing tools at the bottom of the articles. Copying articles for sharing with others is a breach of the Daily News Hungary Copyright Policy.

To purchase additional rights, email info@dailynewshungary.com. 

Source: dailynewshungary.com https://dailynewshungary.com/miraculous-healing-of-dr-beata-halassy-cancer/

Scientist Injects Her Own Cancerous Tumor With Viruses She Grew in Lab

This scientist treated her own cancer with viruses she grew in the lab

A Virologist Took a Dramatic Step to Treat Her Cancer – InsideHook

Blue-state GOP blasts Dem Governor over surprise $7B budget deficit increase | Fox News
The budget deficit is actually $7 billion worse than his initial projections, bringing the total shortfall to nearly $74 billion! https://foxnews.com/politics/blue-state-gop-blasts-dem-gov-surprise-7b-budget-deficit-increase…#FoxNews

In January when we start deporting all illegals, California will save $5 Billion a year. California should be forced to rebate half of that ($2.5 billion) to the US treasury.

Wall Street Apes on X: “Wake Up America, This Is The Cost Of Voting Democrat “Gavin Newsom and California Democrats are spending $5 billion this year to give free healthcare to all illegal immigrants” “To balance the budget, they’re proposing to cut $500 million to school facilities” “The State is https://t.co/9ew5YbMgbK” / X

From 11/7 to about 11/14 they were averaging about 20,000-25,000 ballots per hour.

After a crazy spike during the day of 11/15 to a rate of 64,000 ballots/hour, they slowed down dramatically to between about 2,000-6,000 ballots/hour for the majority of this past week. They only recently picked it up again to 14.5k ballots/hour for the period between 2:23pm and 6:34pm pacific time today.

1) I don’t get the spike, seems like that must be an error. If not, that’s potentially a red flag in the reporting

2) I have no idea why the pace would slow so dramatically when the ballots left are dwindling.

It seems like they are almost trying to draw this out as long as possible.

Wake Up America, This Is The Cost Of Voting Democrat

“Gavin Newsom and California Democrats are spending $5 billion this year to give free healthcare to all illegal immigrants”

Climate change caused an increase in homelessness in California by 37% and $24Billion to disappear into thin air. Climate change caused a $100Billion surplus to turn into a $73Billion deficit in 365 days. Now your kids won’t get a quality education in California. They can fund LGBTQ initiatives to be forced into the curriculum though, rest assured, the money they’re pulling from schools won’t affect that. “To balance the budget, they’re proposing to cut $500 million to school facilities”

Thousands FLEE California because of its HORRIFIC school systems.

Magnus 𝕏 @Magnus_Veritas

My son is disabled and normally gets “ESY” summer school but they basically cancelled it this year. They are literally taking away funding from disabled kids to give it to illegal invaders.

“The State is facing an almost $73 billion deficit”

The Tax Foundation’s State Business Tax Climate Index enables business leaders, government policymakers, and taxpayers to gauge how their states’ tax systems compare. While there are many ways to show how much is collected in taxes by state governments, the Index is designed to show how well states structure their tax systems and provides a road map for improvement.

The 10 best states in this year’s Index are:

1. Wyoming
2. South Dakota
3. Alaska
4. Florida
5. Montana
6. New Hampshire
7. Nevada
8. Utah
9. North Carolina
10. Indiana

The absence of a major tax is a common factor among many of the top 10 states. Property taxes and unemployment insurance taxes are levied in every state, but there are several states that do without one or more of the major taxes: the corporate income tax the individual income tax or the sales tax Nevada, South Dakota, and Wyoming have no corporate or individual income tax (though Nevada imposes gross receipts taxes); Alaska has no individual income or state-level sales tax; Florida has no individual income tax; and New Hampshire and Montana have no sales tax.

This does not mean, however, that a state cannot rank in the top 10 while still levying all the major taxes. Indiana and Utah, for example, levy all the major tax types but do so with low rates on broad bases.

The 10 lowest-ranked, or worst, states in this year’s Index are:

41. Rhode Island
42. Hawaii
43. Vermont
44. Minnesota
45. Maryland
46. Massachusetts
47. Connecticut
48. California
49. New York
50. New Jersey

The states in the bottom 10 tend to have a number of afflictions in common: complex, nonneutral taxes with comparatively high rates. New Jersey, for example, is hampered by some of the highest property tax burdens in the country, has the highest-rate corporate income taxes in the country, and has one of the highest-rate individual income taxes. Additionally, the state has a particularly aggressive treatment of international income, levies an inheritance tax and maintains some of the nation’s worst-structured individual income taxes.

Table 1. 2024

State Business Tax Climate Index Ranks and Component Tax Ranks

State	Overall Rank	Corporate Tax Rank	Individual Income Tax Rank	Sales Tax Rank	Property Tax Rank	Unemployment Insurance Tax Rank
Alabama	39	19	33	50	17	15
Alaska	3	26	1	5	27	48
Arizona	14	22	9	41	11	10
Arkansas	38	28	37	44	24	24
California	48	45	49	47	22	30
Colorado	27	7	13	40	38	44
Connecticut	47	30	46	23	50	26
Delaware	21	50	43	2	6	1
Florida	4	11	1	19	13	4
Georgia	32	9	35	28	28	34
Hawaii	42	18	47	26	31	41
Idaho	16	27	17	11	2	47
Illinois	37	43	14	39	45	42
Indiana	10	12	16	18	3	25
Iowa	33	29	22	15	41	32
Kansas	26	21	27	29	18	16
Kentucky	18	15	18	13	23	46
Louisiana	40	34	29	48	21	13
Maine	34	35	26	8	46	29
Maryland	45	33	45	34	42	43
Massachusetts	46	36	44	14	47	50
Michigan	11	20	12	12	26	7
Minnesota	44	47	42	31	32	31
Mississippi	20	8	19	25	37	5
Missouri	12	3	20	30	9	3
Montana	5	23	28	3	19	22
Nebraska	30	31	32	9	40	9
Nevada	7	25	5	45	4	45
New Hampshire	6	44	10	1	43	40
New Jersey	50	48	48	43	44	37
New Mexico	23	13	36	35	1	11
New York	49	24	50	42	49	39
North Carolina	9	5	15	20	12	6
North Dakota	17	10	21	32	7	14
Ohio	36	39	40	36	5	12
Oklahoma	19	4	24	38	15	2
Oregon	28	49	41	4	20	38
Pennsylvania	31	41	23	16	14	21
Rhode Island	41	40	31	22	35	49
South Carolina	29	6	30	33	36	27
South Dakota	2	1	1	27	30	35
Tennessee	15	42	6	46	33	20
Texas	13	46	7	37	39	8
Utah	8	14	11	21	8	17
Vermont	43	38	39	17	48	18
Virginia	25	16	34	10	29	36
Washington	35	37	8	49	25	19
West Virginia	22	17	25	24	10	33
Wisconsin	24	32	38	6	16	28
Wyoming	1	1	1	7	34	23
District of Columbia	48	30	48	38	50	38

Note: A rank of 1 is best, 50 is worst. Rankings do not average to the total. States without a tax rank equally as 1. DC’s score and rank do not affect other states. The report shows tax systems as of July 1, 2023 (the beginning of Fiscal Year 2024). Fiscal Policy Report Card on America’s Governors 2024 | Cato Institute 

Trump Wants to Make Deals. But It’s Going to Be Harder This Time.

 Progressives begin search for a new leader

Source: Tax Foundation.

Trump’s margins of victory in seven swing states were significantly larger than the closest states in the 2020 Trump-Biden race and every other close presidential contest this century [Evan Vucci/AP]

How Big was Donald Trump’s 2024 election victory?

Donald Trump won both the Electoral College and the popular vote in the 2024 presidential election. In fact, Trump this year became only the second Republican to win the popular vote since 1988. The vast majority of counties saw their margins shift in Trump’s direction, both in places where Republicans historically do well and places where Democrats generally have an edge.

At the same time, Trump’s margins – both in raw votes and percentages – were small by historical standards, even for the past quarter century, when close elections have been the rule, including the 2000 Florida recount election and Trump’s previous two races in 2016 and 2020.

Trump’s victory came without a big boost for down-ballot Republicans. The current narrow margin in the House of Representatives is poised to remain, and Democrats won four Senate races in key battleground states even as Vice President Kamala Harris lost those states to Trump.

During his election night victory party, Trump declared that “America has given us an unprecedented and powerful mandate.”

But Wayne Steger, a DePaul University political scientist, said the election delivered mixed signals. – Search

“Inflation, immigration, some evidence of backlash against Democrats on identity politics, crime, education, and a public mood moving in a conservative direction all suggested a Republican win,” he said.

Still, “I’m inclined to view it as a close election in which there was enough anti-Democratic sentiment to carry the day.”

Here’s how Trump’s victory sizes up against other recent presidential elections: 

Trump voters hail controversial cabinet picks as the government they want

Reasons for Trump to call it a big victory

Trump won all seven of this year’s battleground states – Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. Harris, by contrast, fared worse in these states than President Joe Biden did four years earlier.

Trump’s margins of victory in those seven states were wider – easily – than the margins of the seven closest states in the 2020 Trump-Biden election, and every close presidential contest this century.

Including votes counted through November 19, Trump’s collective margin in this year’s seven battleground states was about 760,000. By comparison, the 2000 election between George W Bush and Al Gore – which the Supreme Court decided after a weeklong Florida recount – produced collective margins of about 46,000 in the seven closest states, or about one-sixteenth as much as in 2024.

Trump also performed well by historical standards for someone running against the White House-occupying party. Going back to 1932, only six other candidates from the out-of-power party have taken as large a share of the vote as Trump’s nearly 50 percent. The others notching a higher percentage were Franklin Roosevelt in 1932, Dwight Eisenhower in 1952, Jimmy Carter in 1976, Ronald Reagan in 1980, Barack Obama in 2008 and Biden in 2020.

Trump’s margin of victory in the Electoral College – 312 out of 538 – was nowhere near the landslide wins of Lyndon Johnson in 1964, Richard Nixon in 1972 or Reagan in 1984. But it was bigger than four of the seven elections this century, including Biden’s four years earlier. 

Where Trump’s victory looks historically small

Other metrics, however, show Trump’s victory was narrow.

Measured both by vote percentages and raw votes, Trump’s margin of victory is modest, even compared with this century’s other close elections.

For votes counted through November 20, Trump’s margin over Harris was 1.62 percent. That’s smaller than any winner since Bush in 2000, when the margin was 0.51 percent. Going back further, only John F Kennedy in 1960 and Nixon in 1968 won the popular vote by smaller margins, 0.17 percent and 0.7 percent, respectively.

Using raw votes, Trump’s margin was also smaller than in any election going back to 2000. At about 2.5 million, it was the fifth-smallest popular vote margin since 1960.

In both percentage and raw votes, Trump’s margin is on pace to be less than half of what Biden achieved four years earlier.

Meanwhile, there is ample evidence that Trump’s strong performance at the top of the ticket did not boost down-ballot candidates much.

Of the seven battleground states, five also held Senate races and one had a gubernatorial contest. The Republican candidate won Pennsylvania’s Senate race, but the Democrat won the Senate races in Arizona, Michigan, Nevada and Wisconsin, and the gubernatorial contest in North Carolina. In North Carolina, Democrats also won the races for lieutenant governor, attorney general, secretary of state, and superintendent of public instruction and were narrowly leading in a state Supreme Court race.

As the final handful of races are called, the US House is poised to end up at or near its margin from the previous two years, producing a Republican margin that is narrow by historical standards. In the state legislatures, Republicans gained only modestly in chamber control, while Democrats made inroads in other legislatures.

“Trump’s victory was solid and convincing,” said Barry Burden, a University of Wisconsin political scientist. Still, “the 2024 elections were not a general endorsement of the Republican Party. Many Republicans down ballot did not perform as well as Trump.”

So far this century, elections have been not only close, but have flipped back and forth between the parties. Since 2000, control of the presidency, the Senate or the House has flipped 16 times in 13 election cycles.

If this pattern holds, the Democrats could be well-positioned for the 2026 midterms and perhaps the 2028 presidential race. “Voters have been unhappy with the state of the country,” said Jack Pitney, a Claremont McKenna College political scientist. “Unless Trump creates an abrupt change in the national mood, Democrats have a good chance at a successful 2026 midterm.”  Big enough. A win is a win, be it by 1 or 1 billion doesn’t matter. Maybe the question should be why did Harris lose? Until democrats answer that they’ll continue to lose.

Democrats won’t see the Whitehouse in the foreseeable future unless they drop their radical progressive ways. Americans rejected their boy and girl stance, butchering our children, wasteful spending..which we will truly only know about after Musk/Vivak expose taxpayer waste..Bidenflation, Obama’s back door rule..We are spending 6 trillion a year while only bringing in 4.5 trillion..

Democratic governors, mayors say they won’t cooperate with Trump’s deportation efforts when he re-enters office | Watch

Those 80000 IRS people were hired for a reason, instead of cutting spending, democrats fully support shaking down the struggling middle class for the difference. The state run media is in shambles after their failed coup against Trump was not believed by the American people..Even with Kamala Harris’ Vote Total being over 74 million which I feel can’t be true.

I personally question Trump’s plan for mass deportation of immigrants.

When we need good workers in this country to keep the economy and new housing starts going while supporting the retirees in this country. I understand TRUMP’s Tariffs may cause more inflation and Fossil fuels may be outdated, because when he left his first term after we were cheated out of that because Biden stayed hidden in his basement. Auto makers did exhibit a willingness to introduce EVs into the marketplace even without the demand for them.

Trump is coming for the executive branch. Does he know what he’s doing?

We know terrorists have crossed our southern border, says Tom Homan | Watch

How Big of a Win Was This…Big enough…………..

Linda Powel  

   I will never understand the disconnect. But I can tell you that as a teacher I see literacy rates plummeting and I believe that also has a lot to do with many parents not being able to critically think. According to the National Literacy Institute: 21% of adults in the US are illiterate in 2024. 54% of adults have a literacy below a 6th-grade level (20% are below 5th-grade level). Massachusetts was the state with the highest rate of child literacy. New Mexico was the state with the lowest child literacy rate. New Hampshire was the state with the highest percentage of adults considered literate. The state with the lowest adult literacy rate was California. And it’s only going to get worse with this new administration. 

Critically think? Nothing but a made up term for a higher level of common sense so what really needs to be done is ensure CRT, DEI, and other “woke” progressive nonsense is removed and replaced with a pure STEM curriculum with a dose of higher level common sense .  You are exactly correct, and thus the reason for Obama and Biden for 12 of the last 16 years …. Rapist and fraudster? Bill Clinton didn’t get elected again?

“Over the last decade-and-a-half, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, Harris-Walz, and a host of other self-described elites have variously invented a wide range of smears and slurs—but about whom exactly? Who are these people that leftwing politicians have so vehemently derided—and why? They include Trump supporters, of course, or what Biden also dubbed “ultra-MAGAs” and Tim Walz called “fascists,” now without the prior qualifying prefix “semi.” In general, these adjectives of disdain denote about half the country according to the results of what will soon be the last three presidential elections. 

This half is more rural than urban, characterized by larger than smaller families, more high-schooled diplomaed than college degrees, and more conventional and traditional than vanguard and trend-setting. Statisticians tell us the new non-clinging Democratic Party finds its greatest support from those who earn less than $50,000 and those who make considerably more than $100,000. These are the rich/poor bookends that surround the reformed Republican party in between.

So, in terms of generalized income and earnings, the left is now the party of the well-to-do professional and credential class and the rich, along with the subsidized poor. The Republicans, by contrast, are increasingly represented by the middle classes.” THIS IS WHY TRUMP WON… If the democrats stand a chance at being in charge of anything again, they had better stop calling people nazis, deplorables and garbage and they better move back to left of center where they traditionally have been. 

Even Bill Maher is complaining about them and he’s as anti-Trump as they get.

Once freedom of the press is repealed the left media will be loaded with lawsuits and crumble and the right side will prevail from here on out. And domestic terrorism will be any speech from the left against the president (AKA TRUMP). I agree with Sylvester Stallone. Trump is our second George Washington. To you Dopy Dems, when the prices start coming down next year. Don’t pay those lower prices. protest for the higher ones.

Well what it tells me is that if this administration follows through on the campaign promises it will mean the 2028 election could be another Republican victory with an even larger percentage of the popular vote. Either way it will probably be the end of one party or the other and the emergence of a new one in 2028.

I know of no one who will ever vote Dem again. It’s out there, we all SEE what the left has done to this country. We’ll fight through the next 4 years and make sure they don’t get in the next election. American people are sick of the sickness the left has pushed. Not anymore. Following the election one reporter stated the Democrats no longer have a party leader.  It does feel that way, who would you say currently would be that person or persons that can best define and represent the party’s platform?  Is the party good with staying with the same people whose ideas are soundly being rejected by the majority of America?  

This election was extremely big of reinvention proportions and demonstrated the real freedom we have in this country. Inflation was highest under Biden, not Trump.  If you didn’t mind Biden’s 20% inflation, you should be alright with 20% inflation from Trump.  Deficit increase under Trump was mainly due to covid spending spurred on by the dems. 

Oh, so all the money flowing under Trump was beyond his control.

He sent two of the three stimulus checks (total $1800 vs Bidens $1400), had all the same unemployment coverage, PPP loans and other spending. You can act like it was so bad for Biden to spend more in early 2021, but your guy spent over half the money during COVID and people voted for added help in 2020 (Biden didn’t hide that he wanted to do more). 

So if Biden is to blame, then so is Trump. Can’t have it both ways bub.

This might come as a shock, but not everyone feels the same way about societal issues as others do.

Considering there hasn’t been an “authority figure” in place to make tough decisions that benefit the nation the last four years, many see this as an upgrade.  Some of us actually think spanking the misbehaving child is better than letting them run around without consequences. We are talking about adults here! Who is considered a “misbehaving child”?

Can Earth Support a Human Future? Maybe, If the Rich Consume Less.

Just like in 2016 when there was a sizable anti-Hillary vote, Trump won on an anti-Biden vote after he spent 4 years lying and denigrating the Biden administration.  His followers don’t care about facts because cult members focus on their leader and many others don’t appreciate the impact of what he plans to do.  There is already a lot of buyer’s remorse being expressed even before he takes office. 

Now, with an ever-shrinking margin of victory as the tally is finalized, we will hear the whining that the radical left wing, Marxist, Communist, Socialist democrats are lying about the margin and producing fake ballots.  That will go on until inauguration day when he will declare the biggest crowd ever and then will whine about the fake news that says Obama’s crowd was bigger.

Pack your bags, it’s over. AMERICA is done with liberal nonsense.

The democrat party is 20 million in debt because of her. Yea id say your statement is accurate. The democrats are morons. IF they put up RFK Jr. they would have stood a solid chance against trump. But nah, they pissed RFK Jr. off and now he’s with us. Kind of sad to see a party cause so much hate and division that iconic people such as Kennedy would leave their party that their family has been a part of forever. 

 Also, do you really think MAGA will go away just because Trump would be term limited? We are not going anywhere. We are here to stay. Will be the reformed and rebuilt dream team political party. The republicans who are against trump are also against MAGA.

Unequivocally wrong. TRUMP was successful even while battling a worldwide epidemic that had not been experienced in decades destroying the global economy. He was inexperienced with the political swamp on his first round but he’s prepared this time and it’s telling from his hardline cabinet picks. These are people who will follow through with the tasks they are given to ensure his campaign promises that the people voted him to complete will be ACHIEVED.

When one adds the votes of the three times President Trump has run for President, President Trump has received more votes for President than anyone in the History of the United States of America has ever accumulated! Actually it does NOT.  Vance/Gabbard for next 8 after that. Dems have NOTHING and I mean NOTHING even close against that ticket, even if they put up Newsom/Whitmer. 

An unassailable margin in the Electoral College and a 2.5 mil advantage in the Popular Vote. I’d say the stats speak for themselves. All the chatter otherwise is just white noise.  

If you really want a historical context, READ HISTORY.

The Liberal media loves to spin and spin to try to put things in their context.

The House, the Senate, and the Presidency went republican. In a very divided country, that is the closest thing to a landslide that can be reasonably expected. For contrast, at the most divided time in our nation’s history Lincoln got only 39.8% of the popular vote and 180 out of 303 Electoral College votes. To quote another US President, “Elections Have Consequences.” If you claim to support our Representative Republic, support that too.

It’s funny, how liberals voted for a man that hid in his basement and doesn’t know what day of the week it is, so someone else is in control that they didn’t vote for but call it a democracy. Even your great Nancy P told AOC it wasn’t a big deal that she won her district with a glass of water with a D beside it.  By the way why isn’t the media looking for the 12 million votes that have simply disappeared if they are so unbiased

Democrats are so funny, they voted for a man that doesn’t know what day of the week it is and someone else commands yet they say they are for democracy. All you have to do is look at a county or geographical breakdown of where Trump and Harris won, and it is clear MAGA had a huge victory!

 One reason to call it a BIG VICTORY, Trump saved America from the Socialist agenda of the Democrats, and kept a totally UNQUALIFIED candidate from winning the WH!

Unchartered territory as the Democrat is the party of complaint, blame, accusations, criticism, opposition, contrived grievance, revenge, platitudes, whining, and covering up for the Deep State.

New ideas?  No Solutions to problems?  No Serve all of the American people?  No

Yeah, we’ll just have to grin and bear with Trump in office as we pay less for basic necessities, fuel, medication, housing, health care and other things we need. What a nightmare to see a positive balance in our bank accounts and to actually have money to spend. The very thought of knowing that we’ll have food on the table, food in the refrigerator, rent or mortgages fully paid and still having spending money. 

Can Earth Support a Human Future? Maybe, If the Rich Consume Less.

 The horror…., the horror…. If this election had been won by only one vote it still would have been a WIN. To this I say take that Woke Liberal Elite Dem “Party” of dictators. When this wonderful candidate is sworn in and takes over the reins from the really mostly disastrous bunch of bungling fools that occupy the place now, It is going to be wonderous for EVERY citizen of this country that is not a Woke Liberal Elite Dem hard core. 

Lamestream Media needs to find a way to shift to the middle and report BOTH sides or it can go too. I am more than sure some country’s Dictator would want these people to control that population using the tools developed here. Other than this I am happy to report Everything is beautiful in its own way Like the summer starry sky or a snow-covered winter’s day  I am so filled with happiness.

The UK left the EU after falling for a pack of lies from the likes of Farage and Johnson. The majority now believe that was a mistake and would like to rejoin. I feel the same will happen in the US within 12 months.

The headline starts as a question. Here’s the answer – he scraped by. There was nothing ”unprecedented or powerful’ about his mandate. The last I saw, he won the popular vote by 1.6%. The Electoral College negates the popular vote. I wonder how many didn’t vote because of this. The Electoral College is a stop-gap. It’s failing. It needs to be fixed.

The less populated states get a couple of votes. There’s a sense among voters in these states as to why bother? The Electoral College carries more weight. There should be an equitable distribution. Base it on the population but how many are actually registered to vote?? Whatever the solution, what exists isn’t working.

Stop with the Trump hate!

The last 4 years the country has been in turmoil thanks to the democrats hiding beneath the “Democracy” ideals and changing the country into destruction! With Trump we can breathe easier without Biden Harris sabotaging everything in America. Also, the ‘Freak Show’ is leaving, and I hope that they’ll take their fans with them….  

MAGA/TAB 

Famed economist Larry Summers issues dire inflation warning to Americans after Trump’s White House win — 3 ways to help protect yourself in 2025

Trump’s vow to use US troops for mass deportations could face intense resistance — starting from within the military

Well armed citizens and a vast political divide: America has all the ingredients for a civil war

Betting Markets Update: Donald Trump Cabinet Picks Chances of Confirmation

Most Democrats Aren’t Motivated to Oppose Donald Trump: New Poll

Intercepted Calls Reveal Harsh Realities for Putin’s Troops in Ukraine

The Tragic Story of The Electric Car – Documentary | Watch

Without the EU, the joke is on us if Trump gets his tariffs

Who Won the 2024 Presidential Election – Search

The Ancestral Puebloan culture’s complex astronomy reveals a legacy of scientific observation and a spiritual tradition, with its powerful impact on the Southwest.

Written on the Landscape: Mysteries Beyond Chaco Canyon (2024) illustrates new ground-breaking research in Anna Sofaer’s exploration of the Chaco Canyon world of magnificent architecture that flourished 1,000 years ago across 70,000 square miles of the American Southwest. The third film in the Chaco Canyon trilogy – Search blends stories from indigenous and non-indigenous scholars to convey an ancient culture’s vital relevance to us today.

WATCH: Written on the Landscape: Mysteries Beyond Chaco Canyon | PBS

NOTE: This program is available on home video for personal use only.

Please order under Home Video.

Chaco Canyon’s high-desert landscape in the American Southwest (approximately 70,000 square miles known as the Four Corners) was home to a once flourishing ancient culture with connections to Mesoamerica. Today it’s revealed in occasional physical remnants. For one, traces of their monumental architecture possess such incredible beauty and simplicity that they bring to mind the most creative of contemporary design.

The cultural flowering of this civilization began in the mid-800s and lasted more than 300 years. A unifying and expressive cosmology, especially their integration of solar and lunar cycles, was a sublime key feature of the Chacoan way of life. Archeologist Anna Sofaer has spent her life studying the Chacoan people. In the film, she serves as our guide, sharing her Solstice Project’s latest research using aerial imagery and LiDAR (lasers that measure distances and create three-dimensional models). Astronomical alignments and their connections to the landscape in the canyon are reflected in the most unpredictable ways. 

WRITTEN ON THE LANDSCAPE:

Mysteries Beyond Chaco Canyon conveys the brilliant achievements of the Chaco civilization—many of which are in grave danger today. This new one-hour documentary reveals the astounding reach of the Chacoans across a region of the American southwest nearly twice the size of Ireland. Without modern tools, wheels or beasts of burden, these ancient people built ceremonial Great Houses and connected them to places of spiritual power with massive “roads,” remarkably straight and as wide as modern two-lane streets. The Chacoans’ feats have been long obscured in a fragile desert environment—only now to be recovered through beautiful aerial footage and with the new technology of LiDAR (aerial laser scanning) revealing the true expanse of the Chacoans’ complex world.

Filmmakers Anna Sofaer and Christopher Beaver take viewers on an exciting exploration of the minds and inspirations of this remarkable culture driven by religion and cosmology. The people emerge from a thousand years ago through new insights of archaeologists, and the words of descendant Pueblo people who hold knowledge of their ancestors to this day.

WRITTEN ON THE LANDSCAPE is the third in a series of films on the Chacoan people by Anna Sofaer who came across the Sun Dagger in 1977 and has spent the rest of her life exploring its significance. The previous films, The Sun Dagger and The Mystery of Chaco Canyon , were narrated by Robert Redford and produced by The Solstice Project for PBS.   Ancient Observatories: Chaco Canyon

Written on the Landscape: Mysteries Beyond Chaco Canyon – Preview



Grade Level: 5 – 12, College, Adults
US Release Date: 2024     Copyright Date: 2024
DVD ISBN: 1-961192-21-7

Reviews “This ethereal and educational film takes viewers through the intricacies of long-standing mysteries that surround Chaco Canyon and discusses how knowledge of astronomy and the sacred was interwoven with its architecture. The film’s collection of stunning imagery combined with flawless narration and insightful commentary from Puebloan descendants creates an experience that leaves viewers wondering about the history of the site, yet peculiarly satisfied that we are ever-so-closer to deciphering aspects of the culture that have long remained an enigma.”Tracy Loe, Editor, American Archaeology magazine “This film is a journey not only through history but through the very soul of a land and its people.”Robert Redford “We have no idea how their thinking went, unless you look at astronomy. Anna Sofaer’s film, Written on the Landscape, is the finest documentary film ever produced about the Chaco Culture. She gives a sweeping and beautiful account of the ancestor’s footprints as written on the landscape.”Phillip Tuwaletstiwa, Member of the Hopi Tribe, Former Deputy Director of the National Geodetic Survey, NOAA “Eye-opening…The Solstice Project’s first two films, The Sun Dagger and The Mystery of Chaco Canyon provided inspirations to my indigenous way of teaching. Written On the Landscape connects previous research and develops a deeper understanding of Chaco. Indigenous cultures related to the Chaco world practice their daily activities through what was learned in the Chaco Canyon and yet the Chaco culture is still a mystery to all.”Kirby Gchachu, educator, Zuni Pueblo “Extraordinarily beautiful and deeply compelling, and brings us tantalizingly close to understanding the mystery of Chaco’s cosmology. I was struck by the Pueblo speaker’s warning toward the end of the film about the danger of human efforts to harness nature, and the parallel between the fate of the Chaco people and the likely fate of our world today.”John Shattuck, Professor of Practice in Diplomacy, Tufts University, former Assistant Secretary of State for Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor “This visually arresting film presents emerging and, in many ways, revolutionary ideas about Chaco Canyon. Diverse voices contemplate relationships between places, human creations, the earth and the sky, revealing the depth and insight of indigenous philosophy and the fundamental dialog between knowledge and power. Stunning footage and ingenious animations convey these points in accessible and inspiring ways. At once grand and intimate, Written on the Landscape conveys the poetry, wisdom and experience of the Chaco World for the benefit of people today, and tomorrow.”Scott Ortman, Associate Professor of Anthropology, Director, Center for Collaborative Synthesis in Archaeology, University of Colorado-Boulder “This is a rich, visually engaging investigation of the sophisticated astronomical knowledge at the center of a cosmological system built by the Chacoan peoples, embodied in architecture arranged in relation to the land and in material culture left behind. The documentary places the known and unknown about the Chaco of the first millennium in context with descendant Puebloan peoples – these are the communities with the knowledge and insight to interpret the past. Written on the Landscape has a message important for the classroom and a general audience.”Ross Frank, Associate Professor of Ethnic Studies, University of California-San Diego “Building upon many of the remarkable astro-archaeological discoveries showcased in the documentary, The Mystery of Chaco Canyon, this new film also illuminates intriguing connections between the ancient Chacoans in what is today northwestern New Mexico and the Mayans in Mesoamerica. Not only did the Chacoans trade with their neighbors to the south, but they also had a similarly stratified society where elites oversaw the sprawling Chacoan complex. Written on the Landscape underscores impressive cultural advancements in pre-Columbian North America and is a great teaching tool, ideal for classroom use.” Bradley Shreve, Editor, Tribal College Journal PlanetQuest Education | https://chacomysterycontinues.com/

A full moon rises from behind the San Juan Mountains in southern Colorado on Dec. 15, 2005. Chimney Rock (right pinnacle) and Companion Chimney (left pinnacle) frame the moon when viewed from the site of the Ancestral Puebloan ruin (foreground) at the time of the full moon nearest the winter solstice when the moon is at its major northern standstill, which occurs every 18.6 years (and is the case in this photograph).

This phenomenon is believed to be associated with the time and place of the construction of the pueblo, which dates from the late 11th century A.D. This site is now a national monument. Adriel Heisey/Courtesy the Solstice Project.

The third film in the Solstice Project’s trilogy, 

Written on the Landscape: Mysteries Beyond Chaco Canyon, delves deeper into the remarkable world of Chaco Canyon, known for its magnificent architecture that flourished 1,000 years ago across an immense high desert of the American Southwest.

This film unveils Anna Sofaer and the Solstice Project’s latest research, revealing how astronomical alignments and their connections to the sacred landscape in the central canyon are mirrored throughout the Chaco world. With aerial imagery, precise surveying, and LiDAR technology, the research uncovers a Chacoan region extending from Chaco Canyon across 70,000 square miles of the American Southwest – a vast high desert known as the Four Corners.

The film expands our understanding of the culture’s reach of ritual architecture and enigmatic ‘roads’ across this region and explores its connections with Mesoamerica.
Insights from Puebloan advisers and new understandings of Mesoamerican parallels shed light on the symbolic power of cardinal directions, the interplay of vertical and horizontal axes, ritual roads, cacao, shells, spirals, and the sun and moon.

As the journey unfolds and highlights Pueblo Bonito as a significant ritual center and powerful hub to the larger region, the depth of the Chacoan people’s knowledge and ingenuity affirms their legacy as pioneers of scientific observation and spiritual integration.

The film also serves as a call to protect this ancient heritage from environmental degradation and continuing threats of energy extraction.
Written on the Landscape showcases the enduring genius of the Chaco people, leaving audiences in awe of their advanced engineering skills and profound astronomical knowledge, applied in acts of spiritual devotion. Puebloan participants in the film affirm their historical connections with Chaco Canyon and the larger region, giving insights into the spiritual significance of the Chacoan people’s remarkable achievements.“Our partnership with New Mexico PBS over the past twenty five years has enabled The Solstice Project to introduce many thousands of people across the state to the great mysteries and unequivocal brilliance of the Chacoan people who created this magnificent community.” – Anna Sofaer, Founder, The Solstice Project

Written on the Landscape: Mysteries Beyond Chaco Canyon, will air on New Mexico PBS, channel 5.1, at 7 p.m. Thursday and on New Mexico PBS, channel 5.4, at 9 p.m. on Friday, June 21. Interested viewers can also stream it free on the PBS app.   The Mystery Of Chaco Canyon | KPBS Public MediaChaco Canyon and the Chaco Phenomenon

Country music legend Patsy Cline was a trailblazer in her genre:

Paving the way for artists who followed in her footsteps.

This GREAT PERFORMANCES presents “Patsy Cline: Walkin’ After Midnight,” a star-studded concert filmed at the historic Ryman Auditorium, Patsy’s home stage in Nashville, to celebrate her life, legacy and music.

The concert features artists from numerous genres like country, pop, rock, gospel, bluegrass including Wynonna Judd, Ashley McBryde, Grace Potter, Beverly D’Angelo, Crystal Gayle, Pat Benatar & Neil Giraldo, Mickey Guyton, Kristin Chenoweth, Rita Wilson, Natalie Grant, Kellie Pickler, Pam Tillis, Tigirlily Gold, Reyna Roberts, Tami Neilson, Tiera Kennedy, Mandy Barnett, Annie Bosko, The Isaacs and Home Free.

The celebration features archival interviews and commentary from fellow artists and those who knew Patsy including her husband, Charlie Dick, and friends like Loretta Lynn, Dottie West, Roy Clark, Harlan Howard and Owen Bradley. 

Watch Patsy Cline: Walkin’ After Midnight | Great Performances Season 52 | PBS SoCal

Patsy Cline: Walkin’ After Midnight | Great Performances | THIRTEEN.

Song List:
“Walkin’ After Midnight” – Mickey Guyton
“Three Cigarettes in An Ashtray” – Tami Neilson
“Always” – Crystal Gayle
“Big City Small Town Girl” – Rita Wilson
“I’ve Loved and Lost Again” – Reyna Roberts
“Too Many Secrets” – Beverly D’Angelo
“Strange” – Grace Potter
“So Wrong” – Pam Tillis
“How Can I Face Tomorrow” – Tigirlily Gold
“Sweet Dreams” – Wynonna
“Leavin’ On Your Mind” – Ashley McBryde
“I Fall To Pieces” – Kristin Chenoweth
“Back In Baby’s Arms” – Tiera Kennedy
“Seven Lonely Days” – Home Free
“You’re Stronger Than Me” – Annie Bosko
“The Woman I Am” – Kellie Pickler
“You Belong To Me” – The Isaacs
“Just a Closer Walk with Thee” – Natalie Grant
“Why Can’t He Be You” – Mandy Barnett
“She’s Got You” – Rita Wilson
“Imagine That” – Pat Benatar & Neil Giraldo
“Crazy” – Wynonna

Revolutionizing Dementia Care – Google Search

What two personality traits are linked to dementia?

Neuroticism, low conscientiousness, and negative affect were associated with dementia diagnoses across samples, measures, and time. Other personality traits may be more protective; for example, conscientiousness, extraversion, and positive affect were associated with a lower risk for dementia.

What are the 6 Cs in dementia care?

Care, Compassion, Courage, Commitment, Competence and Communication carry many different meanings within the care setting. They are our building blocks for improving care and collaborations amongst the multi-disciplinary teams that we work with.

Alzheimer’s Documentary Series | Revolutionizing Dementia Care | Episode 1 | PBSis a PBS program that explores how people with dementia can live full lives by focusing on their abilities instead of their limitations. The show highlights innovative approaches in memory care communities, such as: 

• Ability-focused programsThese programs can include equine and horticulture therapies, as well as education programs for local businesses. 
• Social engagementIncluding people with dementia in social gatherings, clubs, and everyday activities can improve their well-being. 

What is looping in dementia?

Looping is very common in dementia care. It can involve the repeating of stories or fixations. How you approach it and/or embrace it makes a world of difference in your interaction with the individual. Allow it to happen and you can have a deeper, richer interaction with your loved one.

Three word recall test

A demonstration of the delayed 3 word recall test used to assess patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer’s disease This is usually part of a wider test called the ACE-III where you do other testing elements in the interim What do you have the person while they are waiting 3-5 min? Is it completely quiet or do you distract them with another conversation or activity?

What do dementia eyes look like?

It’s common for people with dementia to stare blankly at a wall or into the void as if distracted. They may also seem to avoid eye contact. This is often referred to as “glassy eyes” or “glazed eyes,” though it may have other causes.

Here are some Don’ts:

Don’t argue. Don’t confront. Don’t remind them they forget. Don’t question recent memory.

Don’t ask direct questions, listen and learn, and don’t contradict. That’s the TL;DR summary of the three golden rules of dementia. But applying them in the wrong context — and not knowing what to expect at each stage of dementia — can make using these rules much more challenging.

Here are some tips for communicating with someone with dementia:

• Speak calmly 
• Listen to their concerns 
• Avoid arguing 
• Reassure them that they are safe and you are there to help 
• Use gentle touching to help them calm down 
• Don’t confront them 
• Don’t remind them they forget 
• Don’t question recent memory 

What is the Happy Pill for dementia patients?

Antidepressants. Antidepressants such as sertraline, citalopram, mirtazapine and trazodone are widely prescribed for people with dementia who develop changes in mood and behaviour. There is some evidence that they may help to reduce agitation – particularly citalopram.

How to stop dementia from progressing?

What Can You Do?

1. Control high blood pressure. …
2. Manage blood sugar. …
3. Maintain a healthy weight. …
4. Eat a healthy diet. …
5. Keep physically active. …
6. Stay mentally active. …
7. Stay connected with family and friends. …
8. Treat hearing problems.

1. Dementia life expectancy: Duration and stages
2. Alzheimer’s Diet and Nutrition Guide: Foods to Eat and Avoid
3. What is the number one food that fights dementia?
4. There’s no single or “best” food to fight dementia. Eating patterns that include several anti-inflammatory foods may help to prevent or slow dementia. These include leafy greens, nuts, berries, whole grains, beans, and olive oil.
5. What is the daily drink for dementia?What is the daily drink for dementia?
6. Souvenaid | Dementia Australia  Souvenaid^® is a nutritional supplement that contains a combination of nutrients that are thought to support brain functions affected in mild cognitive impairment and early Alzheimer’s disease.
7. What is the number one trigger for dementia
8. Three of the most common types of behavioral triggers in dementia patients are confusion, pain or discomfort, and a changing or overwhelming environment.  
9. Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Effects pn the Brain – Search 
10. By Linda Rath A lot of people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) report having trouble with memory, attention, and mental focus. They forget names and appointments, struggle to find the right words and have trouble making and carrying out plans. Some say that the loss of mental clarity, commonly called brain fog, is almost as distressing as arthritis itself.
11. Limited Research
12. It’s hard to say exactly how common fuzzy think­ing is in RA because researchers have largely ignored it. “We have relatively good literature on cognitive problems in lupus and fibromyalgia, where brain fog is well established, but nobody has really studied RA,” explains Patti Katz, PhD, a professor of medi­cine at the University of California, San Francisco.
13. Katz and her colleagues looked at 15 studies on RA and cognition published between 1994 and 2016. Many were small – less than 100 patients – and not all were high quality. Yet most showed that people with rheumatoid arthritis performed more poorly on cognitive tests than their peers or controls. Memory, verbal communica­tion, attention, concentration and problem-solving seemed to cause the most trouble.
14. Who Gets It and Why?
15. There are several theories why cognitive prob­lems may be more common in RA and other inflammatory types of arthritis.
16. Some scientists, including Mark Swain, MD, a professor at the University of Calgary in Canada, think inflammation tops the list. More than a decade ago, he and his colleagues demonstrated that chronic inflammation in the body – the result of cytokines like tumor necrosis factor (TNF) – can change the way the brain functions. The brain doesn’t change structurally, but networks of nerves start talking to each other differently. This can contribute to many disease-associated symptoms, including brain fog.
17. Swedish researchers reached the same conclusion after fol­lowing nearly 1,500 patients with various joint disorders for two decades. They found a significantly higher rate of cognitive decline in those with RA and suggested that chronic inflammation “played an important role in increasing the risk.”But Katz thinks it might not be that simple.“
18. RA is a disease that has a lot of elements, and we need to think about all of them because people are really complicated,” she says.
19. Some factors that may contribute to brain fog include:
20. • Pain. It’s well known that chronic pain can affect thinking. Some of the brain’s pain processing centers overlap with areas involved with memory and attention. When they compete for limited processing resources, pain often wins out. Pain may also rewire how the brain works.
21. • Depression. Depression is common in RA. Symptoms can include trouble with planning, decision-making, memory and mental clarity – the same symptoms reported by people with brain fog. Katz says one of the challenges of studying cognitive problems is the difficulty in distinguishing them from depression. Some researchers – though not Katz – see brain fog as a symptom of depression, not a separate condition.
22. • Cardiovascular Disease. People with RA are more likely to have narrowed or blocked arteries in the brain – the result of systemic inflammation. This can cause problems with memory, thinking and reasoning.
23. • Arthritis Meds. Methotrexate is a mainstay of RA treatment and corticosteroids are sometimes used for short-term pain relief. Both may cause cognitive problems, mood changes and confusion. A small study published in Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology in 2017 found that RA patients treated with methotrexate and other conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) had higher risk of developing dementia than those who took other medications. Moderate to high doses of corticosteroids can lead to cognitive problems in some people, more commonly women.
24. • Lack of Exercise. Few things have a stronger demonstrated link to brain health than exercise. Thousands of studies show the long-term benefits, but new research suggests exercise can have an immediate effect, too. Carson Smith, MD, and colleagues in the University of Maryland School of Public Health found that older adults’ memory improved significantly after a single 30-minute exercise session. A French study found that just a 15-minute jog boosted energy and mental clarity.
25. What the CDC Says
26. In 2017, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) researchers published a study comparing cognition in more than 6,000 people with and without arthritis. Unlike earlier, smaller studies, it found no difference in brain function between the two groups. The researchers say they had different results because they considered pain, depression, lack of exercise, age and other factors linked to both brain fog and RA.
27. Once these were accounted for, people with RA showed no more cognitive problems than other older adults. What was associated with elements of impaired brain function were a sedentary lifestyle, depression and having a lower socioeconomic level. The implication is that RA itself doesn’t cause brain fog, but factors associated with it may.
28. Targeting Several Risk Factors If cognitive problems are complex, then the solution needs to be complex, too. That’s the thinking behind a groundbreaking clinical trial in Finland called the FINGER study. In this two-year ran­domized controlled trial involving more than 1,200 older adults with an elevated risk of dementia, lifestyle changes including an anti-inflammatory diet, exercise and brain training cut cognitive decline by 30%. Targeting several risk factors will deliver the optimal benefits.
29. Here are some tips that can help you keep your brain sharp:
30. • Sleep well. Deep, restorative sleep helps to clear away the cobwebs. Develop a healthy sleep routine and stick to it. Make sure your bedroom is cool and dark, avoid late-day caffeine and turn off screens at least an hour before bed.
31. • Talk to your doctor about medications. If you take conventional DMARDs or long-term corticosteroids, discuss the pros and cons of switching to another drug. Talk about your other meds, too. Some, including anti­cholinergics (used to treat overactive bladder, COPD and other conditions) can also cause brain fog.
32. • Don’t skip workouts. There’s almost nothing exercise doesn’t help. Pain, mobility, mood, fatigue and mental clarity all may improve in a single session, but the greatest benefits happen over time.
33. • Notice brain fog patterns. Your symptoms may be worse in the morning or when you’re tired or stressed. Try to schedule tasks that require focus and attention when you’re at your best.
34. • Be present. It’s easy to worry about the future, espe­cially when you have a chronic illness.
35. But concern about things that haven’t happened yet take up valuable mental space. Instead, focus on the present moment, says Ashira Blazer, MD, a rheumatologist and assistant professor at NYU Langone Health in New York
36. Bottomline, whether having RA directly contributes to cognitive impairment or not, following a healthy lifestyle and keeping your disease under control can help keep brain fog at bay.
37. Learn about the possible links between rheumatoid arthritis and cognitive effects and how to manage them.
38. What is the most aggressive form of dementia?

Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (CJD) | Symptoms & Treatments | alz.org

Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease causes a type of dementia that gets worse unusually fast. More common causes of dementia, such as Alzheimer’s, dementia with Lewy bodies and frontotemporal dementia, typically progress more slowly. Through a process scientists don’t yet understand, misfolded prion protein destroys brain cells.

Why does Finland have the highest dementia mortality rate … – PubMed

Environmental factors there include: 1) a climate that is both very cold and humid resulting in housing frequently harboring molds that are capable of producing a neurotoxic mycotoxin 2) the Gulf of Finland as well as Finnish lakes harbor cyanobacteria that produce the neurotoxin, beta-N-methyl amino-L-alanine, known …

Why does India have the lowest dementia mortality rate … – PubMed – Search

These are the first AD incidence rates to be reported from southern India. The incidence rates appear to be much higher than that reported from rural north India, comparable with that reported from China, and marginally lower than that reported from the western world.  Incidence of Alzheimer’s disease in India: A 10 years follow-up study – PMC

Reactive Intelligence in Sports Performance

BlazePod trains your Reactive Intelligence… What’s that you ask?… It’s not just the speed in which you react, but the way in which you respond. This is made up of 3 major elements;

1) Recognition – BlazePod’s visual training will enhance the way you scan your environment, taking in all you see around you, selecting what’s relevant to you in the most efficient way possible.

2) Processing – BlazePod’s unique settings and drills will help improve the speed in which our brain processes the information we recognize and make the best possible decisions which leads us to…

3) Response – The physical element that our brain tells us to make. This is where we make the correct pass in the split second, we have to create the most successful scenario leading to the WIN! Improving your Reactive Intelligence will make you a more complete, smarter and faster responding athlete!

Oldest ever ‘Jesus is God’ inscription found in Israeli prison, deemed greatest find

Harris reveals good-vibes economic policies. Experts weigh in.

 Medora Lee USA TODAY

Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris revealed for the first time some big economic plans on Friday, but these experts had mixed reactions on how much some of them would help everyday Americans.

Harris, who said in a fact sheet she’s focused on “some of the sharpest pain points American families are confronting,” plans to ease rent increases, cap prescription drug prices for everyone, boost first-time home buyers, end grocery price gouging and bolster the child tax credit.

Many of these plans resonate with voters who have struggled in the past few years with soaring inflation, but some experts are wary of what they call “price controls” to fight high prices and how Harris intends to pay for some of her proposals.

Any changes to the tax code also would require congressional approval and depend heavily on which party controls the House and Senate, tax experts say.”It’s optimistic and targeted to improve the middle class; however, we have yet to see details, and it’s unclear how the congressional elections will impact the likelihood of passage,” said Mark Baran, managing director at consulting firm CBIZ MHM’s National Tax Office.

Former Republican New York congressman and senior vice president at business consultancy Alliantgroup Rick Lazio said in an email that the Harris campaign will need to consider “the societal costs of unsustainable higher public debt and its impact on inflation and the ability to respond to unplanned events, like recession, wars, pandemics, and natural disasters.”

The nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget estimated her full plan would increase deficits by $1.7 trillion over a decade and grow to $2 trillion if temporary housing policies were made permanent. “The Harris campaign has said this would be paid for through taxes on corporations and high earners and that they support the revenue raisers in the President’s fiscal year 2025 budget but has not put forward specific offsets as part of their agenda to lower costs for American families,” it said in a release.

To get a better view of what experts liked and questioned, USA TODAY has compiled a more detailed look of each proposal.

Child tax credit

A return to COVID-19-era child tax credit policies, which were $3,600 for qualifying children under age 6 and $3,000 for other qualifying children under age 18.

The credit is now $2,000 per qualifying child under age 17 and phases out for single filers earning over $200,000 and married couples with more than $400,000 in income. Republican vice presidential nominee JD Vance has floated a $5,000 credit and hinted at no income thresholds.

New, expanded tax relief of up to $6,000 for families with a newborn.

“We were super-excited to see her propose this big expansion,” said Mary Nugent, adviser of domestic policy at nonprofit Save the Children US. “To put it front and center and to be including this new kind of bonus for new parents with those youngest kids is really exciting in terms of the impact.”

Either Harris’ or Vance’s plan would reduce child poverty significantly , she said. The enhanced credit during the pandemic did so by half, she noted. “Most families would see an increased credit and, the top line there is that we would see massive cuts in child poverty.”

Health care and food prices

$35 price cap on insulin for Medicare recipients to cover insulin and annual out-of-pocket costs of $2,000 for all Americans, not just seniors.

Stiffer regulations and strict antitrust enforcement to prevent increased costs for consumers on drugs and food.

First-ever federal ban on price gouging on food and groceries.

The Groundwork Collaborative, a nonprofit progressive advocacy group, praised Harris’ push to hold companies accountable. “When just a handful of big companies control the majority of the market, or even control the market in a single region, they have the power to raise prices without worrying about a competitor nipping at their heels,” Lindsay Owens, the group’s executive director, said in a statement.

Economists were less enthusiastic, calling Harris’ efforts “price controls.”

“Harris is continuing with the Biden administration theme of blaming high inflation on corporate greed and price gouging – be it oil producers, pharmaceutical firms or, in this case, grocery retailers – rather than excessively loose pandemic-era fiscal and monetary policies,” wrote Paul Ashworth, chief North America economist for research firm Capital Economics, in a note. “She wants Congress to pass a federal ‘price gouging’ ban. It sounds uncomfortably like price controls, which could lead to product shortages.”

Housing

• Block data firms from increasing lease rates and prevent Wall Street investors from buying homes in bulk to resell at a premium.
• New tax incentives for builders who construct “starter homes.”
• Provide up to $25,000 in down-payment support for first-time homeowners.

“I’m encouraged by the recognition by Vice President Harris of the affordable housing crisis in America,” Lazio said. “There is no congressional district in the nation that hasn’t seen a spike in the housing supply imbalance. Having said that, the devil is in the details, and some of the initiatives like the subsidy for first time homebuyers regardless of their wealth or income needs to be rethought.”

Ashworth also noted many developed countries around the world “have tried to boost homebuilding but have struggled to achieve their goals because of capacity constraints in the construction industry or other bottlenecks, like zoning regulations.”

Tax-free tips:Trump, Harris agree on one thing: No taxes on tips. Here’s how it could impact the budget

What wasn’t discussed?

• Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which expires at the end of 2025, is a massive tax package passed in 2017 that included provisions that touch almost every American. If it expires, tax rates for most Americans will rise, income brackets will narrow, and the standard deduction would get cut in half which could force many Americans to itemize again, among many other things.

It’s the “big elephant in the room,” Baran said. “Letting it expire completely will hurt middle-class Americans because tax rates will go up.”

Ashworth also noticed the lack of discussion “of whether she would support the extension of the original Trump tax cuts, even for those making less than $400,000 a year. That potential fiscal cliff that would hit at the end of next year is the real policy battleground.”

• No tax on tipped wages, which is a pledge Harris made at a rally in Nevada last weekend. Trump had made this proposal earlier.

This is “bad economic policy, but understandable from a political standpoint given that it could be enough to win the election race in Nevada,” Ashworth said. “Assuming there are limits on the amount of income that can be counted as tips and that only income taxes are eliminated rather than payroll taxes too, that tax cut might cost up to $150 billion over the next decade.”

• Small and medium-sized businesses.

“I’m disappointed that there was nothing today that spoke to the need to protect and incentivize these businesses that employ half of all Americans, and up until recently have generated most of the industry innovation in America,” Lazio said. He said he’d like to see Harris endorse tax incentives for research and development to spur innovation and to keep tax rates for small businesses steady.

 “Small-business people are middle-class people, too,” Baran said.

Medora Lee is a money, markets, and personal finance reporter at USA TODAY. You can reach her at mjlee@usatoday.com and subscribe to our free Daily Money newsletter for personal finance tips and business news every Monday through Friday morning.  

What’s next for Kamala Harris?

Kamunism unveils budget breaking $1.7 trillion economic plan – Search

Her ‘plan’ calls for doling out $25,000 for down payments by up to 3 million first-time home-buyers, 

plus $6,000 tax breaks for ‘lower and middle’ income families with children up to a year old.

By Diana Glebova, Josh Christenson and Victoria Churchill | The New York Post

RALEIGH, North Carolina — Vice President Kamala Harris on Friday unveiled the economic policies she would enact in her first 100 days in office — and it comes with a whopping estimated $1.7 trillion in handouts, as well as government price controls on groceries amid ravaging Biden-Harris administration inflation.

Her economic plan includes measures to dole out $25,000 to help first-time homeowners with their down payments and give up to $6,000 tax breaks for lower and middle-income families who have a child in their first year of life. Harris did not say what incomes qualify as “lower” and “middle.”

The housing subsidies alone are “absolutely inflationary” and would “push a $2 trillion dollar deficit even higher,” Brian Riedl, a senior economic fellow at the Manhattan Institute, told The Post, referring to the already projected budget shortfall for 2024. Those subsidies make up just $200 billion of the total $1.7 trillion handouts pledged to voters.

Economists warn that Harris’ price control plans could force small businesses to close. AP

‘Reckless’ handouts

A slew of economists The Post spoke to have already slammed the plan’s hefty price tag amid an already-struggling economy.

“The CRFB estimates make it clear that the Harris agenda—like Biden’s before it—will be fiscally reckless and economically damaging,” Adam Michel, the director of Tax Policy Studies at the libertarian Cato Institute, told The Post.

“Writing people large checks and enforcing price controls is a recipe for expanding demand and shrinking supply, creating shortages and necessitating rationing,” Michel said.

“The $6,000 child tax credit is the next entry in the child tax credit arms race, in which Republicans and Democrats are trying to outdo each other in writing Americans ever bigger checks. It will only get more expensive from here.”

“This is very reckless to be adding this type of debt to our already existing mountain of debt,” said Joel Griffith, an economic research fellow at the Heritage Foundation, told The Post in reference to the rising national deficit that currently sits at $34 trillion and is expected to reach $50 trillion by 2034.

The nonpartisan Tax Foundation in an analysis was particularly troubled by the lack of detail she provided over where the funding for the handouts would come.

Here’s what you need to know about Kamala Harris’ plans for the economy

• Harris plans to reduce grocery costs, which includes working with Congress to ban “price gouging,” or stopping sellers from pricing their products excessively.
• Harris promised to work toward construction of three million new homes to “end the housing shortage” within a four-year time frame, offering a first-ever tax incentive to people building starter homes.
• The Harris campaign is running on expanding the Child Tax Credit to give middle-income and lower-income families up to $6,000 in tax breaks for families who have children in their first year of life.
• Harris wants to “to cancel medical debt for millions of Americans and to help them avoid accumulating such debt in the future,” capping insulin costs at $35 and out-of-pocket prescription drug costs at $2,000.

“Harris’s agenda is missing details on how her proposed tax subsidies and expansions in federal programs would be paid for, risking a worsening debt trajectory,” the foundation said in an analysis.

“The combined cost of the proposals would likely exceed $2 trillion over 10 years, putting upward pressure on inflation to the extent they are deficit-financed and leading to a further prolonging of the Federal Reserve’s high-interest-rate stance.”

Harris is also proposing giving tax incentives to businesses who build affordable housing and to those Americans building houses themselves and is planning to build 3 million more homes in the next four years.

“Harris’s tax agenda is problematic for three major reasons: it would further entrench social policy and spending into the tax code, it would subsidize home buyers rather than address supply constraints, and it does not specify sufficient offsets to pay for the subsidies, worsening an unsustainable debt trajectory,” the Tax Foundation said.

EJ Antoni, a public-finance economist at The Heritage Foundation, told The Post that “the Harris agenda is even worse than the Biden agenda: it means more spending, more borrowing, and more money printing to pay for it all.

“The economy is already suffering under an increased regulatory burden from the last 3 1/2 years of overregulation and this agenda would send those cost increases into overdrive.”

”Harris’ economic proposals are a recipe for higher inflation and widespread shortages of basic items necessary for living like food and housing,” added Cato budget and entitlement policy director Romina Boccia.

Price controls

The Trump campaign has especially taken issue with her price control policies, calling them “communist” and comparing her proposals to those of authoritarian leaders in Venezuela and Cuba.

“When the government comes in and takes over food production and sets prices, that inevitably leads to food shortages and even famines,” economist Kevin Hassett said in a Trump campaign press call.

Harris blamed the high grocery prices on the supply chain disruption during the pandemic, but admitted that costs have remained high even after the logistical issues got better in the years since the height of COVID.

“A loaf of bread costs 50% more today that it did before the pandemic. Ground beef is up almost 50%” she said, oddly referring to the lower costs under the Trump administration.

That’s why she thinks federal price limits are needed for the first time in US history.

“We know that many Americans don’t yet feel that progress in their daily lives, costs are still too high, and on a deeper level, for too many people, no matter how much they work, it feels so hard to just be able to get ahead,” Harris said in Raleigh at her campaign stop.

“As President, I will be laser focused on creating opportunities for the middle class that advance their economic security, stability and dignity. Together, we will build what I call an opportunity economy.”

But economist Stephen Moore in the Trump campaign call said “the average margin for a grocery store or 7 Eleven sell food is between two and three percentage points,” predicting that “many of them will go out of business” with price controls.

Riedl agreed, telling The Post that “price controls do not eliminate inflation — they only delay it, with huge shortages in the meantime.”

The Trump campaign has stressed that Harris is currently in office as vice president and has presided over the economy for the last three and a half years.

Harris argued that Trump did not offer concrete policy proposals in his speech on the economy that he did on Thursday.

In his speech standing in front of groceries, Trump blamed Harris for the current economy and said he would “drill baby drill” when he got back into office, lowering the price of energy.

He also said he would free up federal land to build more houses on and work to reduce the price of energy by 50%.

Harris has not yet revealed her energy policies, other than her campaign telling reporters that she has reversed her 2020 presidential campaign position that would have banned fracking.     ##  The New York Post e-Edition

Harris’s economic pitch could cost $1.7 trillion: Analysis

by Aris Folley – 08/16/24 5:25 PM ET

Vice President Harris speaks during an event to discuss the administration’s efforts to lowering prescription drug prices at the Prince George’s Community College in Upper Marlboro, Md., on Thursday, August 15, 2024.

Vice President Harris’s recent proposals laid out as part of her Agenda to Lower Costs for American Families could increase the nation’s deficits by $1.7 trillion over a decade, a new analysis found, though the campaign is vowing offsets through taxes on the rich.

Harris unveiled several proposals Friday as part of her agenda for the economy if she wins the presidency later this year, including a measure that would beef up the child tax credit (CTC) to provide a $6,000 tax cut to families with newborn children.

The plan also calls for the restoration of an expansion to the CTC that was passed as part of a sweeping coronavirus relief package in 2021 known as the American Rescue Plan, pressing for up to $3,600 per child tax credit for some families.

In an analysis from the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB) released later on Friday, the group estimated Harris’s proposals to expand the CTC could come with a price tag of $1.2 trillion from fiscal 2026 through 2035.

Other measures proposed in the plan that would expand the earned income tax credit (EITC), set up a tax credit for first-time homebuyers, extend the Affordable Care Act premium tax credit expansion and efforts to support affordable housing, could cost upwards of $700 billion during the same time frame, CRFB noted.

The group estimates the proposed plan could cost $1.95 trillion over 10 years, but notes that figure could climb to $2.25 trillion if some of the proposed housing measures set to take place if Harris is elected are made permanent.

However, the group says the estimated cost is “partially offset” through other agenda items aimed at lowering prescription drug costs that could help generate “roughly $250 billion of savings.”

“The Harris campaign has emphasized that the major housing policies would only be in effect for four years. However, if they were extended permanently, the fiscal impact would grow to $2 trillion,” the group said.

2024 campaign heats up as Harris unveils economic planVice President Kamala Harris on Friday unveiled a populist economic agenda, proposing a new plan to provide tax relief for more than 100 million middle-class and lower-income Americans as she builds out the details of her governing agenda weeks after locking down the Democratic presidential nomination. CNN political and economics experts weigh in with their reactions. 00:00–9:59 CNN’s Wolf Blitzer speaks with CNN reporters and political analysts about Harris’ plan and how the Trump campaign is reacting. 10:00–17:37 CNN’s Phil Mattingly speaks with CNN economics and political commentator Catherine Rampell and Heritage Foundation distinguished fellow Stephen Moore about how Trump and Harris are approaching the economy. 17:38–22:56 CNN’s Wolf Blitzer talks with North Carolina Gov. Roy Cooper, who attended Harris’ speech in the state. 22:57–30:49 CNN’s Sara Sidner is joined by CNN senior political commentator David Axelrod and former Mitt Romney presidential campaign chief strategist Stuart Stevens about how the two candidates are preparing to debate.

Department of Government Efficiency @DOGE

In FY2023, the U.S. Government spent $6.16. trillion while only bringing in $4.47 trillion. The last budget surplus was in 2001. This trend must be reversed, and we must balance the budget.

Kamala Harris unveils economic plan — including a whopping $1.7T in handouts, fed ban on grocery store ‘price gouging’

Feds blew $267M fighting ‘misinformation’ during the COVID-19 pandemic under Biden — as Trump vows to ban ‘censorship cartel’

Poll: Republicans reverse views on economy and election fraud after Trump’s win; much smaller shifts among Democrats

Majority of Americans approve of Trump’s plans and policies for the future — ‘warm’ feelings at an all-time high: poll

Trump’s biggest gains among Jews were with religious voters — as secular Jews still backed Harris: report

‘Hit By A Sledgehammer’: Trump’s Second Victory Seemingly Deals Death Blow To #Resistance

Our universe has an anti-universe twin moving backwards in time, study finds.

Harris pledges to tackle costs, build houses, lower taxes in economy speech | Reuters

Kamunism Harris unveils budget breaking $1.7 trillion economic plan – Search

12 Photos of Chernobyl that Prove Humans Are Destroying the World

The Electoral Problem for Democrats: It’s the Neoliberalism, Stupid

House Democrats prepare to make Mike Johnson’s life hell

Opinion: Who will turn the Democrats around?

Who wins presidential election 2024 – Search

Trump’s YMCA Dance Took Over The World!

Opinion by Bruce Yandle, Tribune News Service

“Here is the reality,” said Sen. Bernie Sanders in his analysis of Donald Trump’s strong electoral victory and support from some traditional Democrats: “The working class of this country is angry, and they have reason to be angry. We are living in an economy today where the people on top are doing phenomenally well while 60 percent of our people are living paycheck to paycheck.”

Household data spanning 2019-22 support Sanders’ argument. The Federal Reserve found substantial increases in average net worth for all income levels except the poorest 20% of families (though the Fed doesn’t adjust these figures for how much of the accompanying federal debt we’ll each bear). In any case, according to the senator, greed was the main culprit. I think a fair portion of the blame lies with misplaced generosity.

Greed is ever-present in human affairs, but those years included something unique: Massive government efforts to soften the blows of COVID-19. Paradoxically, this helped the rich get richer and contributed to the 2024 political climate.

The government’s stimulus program—much of which ended up as generous but perhaps unintended taxpayer gifts to the wealthy—and Fed interest rate cuts led to rising real estate prices and substantial gains in stock market values. More dollars in the economy meant each dollar was worth less as inflation took off. Higher-income households are less damaged by inflation than working-class people who spend most of their income on goods and services.

  Related video: Bernie Sanders’ Final Push for Kamala Harris (Newsworthy Women) – Search

Meanwhile, contrary to plans, federal programs disproportionately transferred billions to owners and managers of businesses across the nation rather than to hourly workers. On top of that, a lot of COVID-relief money, paid for in no small part by current or future working-class taxpayers, simply got wasted.

A review of the situation by Cecilia Rouse, Brookings Institution president and chair of the Council of Economic Advisors from 2021-23, offers a revealing and disturbing analysis. Rouse focuses on both the disastrous effects of the pandemic and assessing the massive $4.5 billion in stimulus packages delivered by the Trump and Biden administrations.

Though just four years ago, it bears mentioning that as President Joe Biden took office, some 460,000 Americans had been killed by the pandemic. Before the pandemic’s end, 1.2 million U.S. lives would be taken. The economy’s shutdown brought a devastating disruption to daily life. Rouse points out that in April 2020, “the number of Americans living under stay-at-home orders reached more than 300 million.” Weekly claims for unemployment compensation rose from a typical level of 207,000 in March 2020 to 6,137,000 in April.

Stimulus poured in, we learned to better protect ourselves and things quickly started improving. Employment recovered in record time. The nation dealt with one of the most severe, but thankfully short, disruptions in modern times.

But given the damaging bout with inflation that followed, was the stimulus too large? Was the waste, fraud and abuse too much? Did working class people get a fair share? Or was the system tilted so that higher-income people gained too much?

Rouse examines two specific programs. The $800 billion Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) provided forgivable loans to small businesses and nonprofits to retain workers, meet payroll and insurance costs, and keep the doors open. The Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) program provided larger loans payable over 30 years. Some 1 million firms received PPP loans and 3.9 million obtained EIDL loans.

Researchers show that two-thirds of the PPP’s forgivable loans went to business owners and shareholders, not to employees or wage earners. The General Accountability Office indicates that fraud totaled $64 billion out of the $800 billion. Estimates of fraud under the EIDL program indicate that $136 billion was siphoned off.

Other research indicates that PPP loans cost between $169,000 and $256,000 for each job saved, more than twice the annual wage of the workers affected. With owners and executives at the top siphoning off money, protecting workers was neither simple nor affordable.

Let us hope that our nation never faces another tragic pandemic. But if it does, let us also hope that our government doesn’t take actions that enable the rich to get richer while the poor get poorer in more ways than one.  Should working-class voters be angry about greed, or at those who enabled it?

Bernie Sanders Explains What Donald Trump Did That Worked With Voters

Bernie Sanders 110 Page Communist MANIFESTO – Search

____

Bruce Yandle is a distinguished adjunct fellow with the Mercatus Center at George Mason University, dean emeritus of Clemson University’s College of Business & Behavioral Science, and former executive director of the Federal Trade Commission.  ©2024 Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

___ 

It was neither of those, and not Bernie’s socialist answer either.  

It was elitist disdain, followed by extravagant fraud, spending trillions of money, running up debt that can only be paid by the next      generation.  Greed is not the fault of working people. England expects every man to do his duty.  The U.S.A. expects every man and woman to conduct his and her financial affairs with prudence and thrift.  The financial system–call it Wall Street–conducts its affairs with anything but prudence or thrift.  The U.S. has behaved as hypocrisy personified.  Buccaneering Wall Street with GREED and imperious Washington have always conducted themselves as Don’t do as we do; do as we tell you.

Every single American is expected to live within his or her means and keep a balanced checkbook. The government doesn’t. A fact they flaunt in struggling Americans faces. Then that government has the nerve to call it price gouging and blame the people for this. We’re held to the letter of the law, better not step out of line or your whole life is ruined. The government openly thumbs their nose at the law, essentially daring us to do something about it. 

Well… we did something. We elected Trump.

The Dems take the minority vote for granted.  Dems support illegals but not citizens.  They make lots of promises to the minorities and then like most of their promises they fail to deliver.  Same thing with election cycles time after time and year after year.  The minorities are tired of empty promises for the Dem elite who pursue their pet projects after the election.  This is nothing new. The government has failed to enforce antitrust legislation for decades now. The fact so few people own so much of the economy is the real problem.

The American Promise is that if we go to school, work hard, and become a productive and faithful employee, we can then expect to support a family, raise and educate our children, enjoy a healthy and fulfilling life and retire with dignity. We weren’t supposed to have to win the lottery, or be a corporate executive to enjoy the American dream. 

That was the vision of middle class Americans, who once modeled the image of what it was to be an American. The middle class is disappearing in direct proportion to the demise of the American union movement. After World War II, nearly 30 percent of our work force belonged to unions. Today, barely half of labor is organized. Today, only a few workers own the world’s resources while most live in poverty. 

Low wages for blue collar thralls are common. 

For most of these workers there is no health insurance or retirement plans. The result? Taxpayers across the United States are making up for what employers should be paying with public assistance programs. That’s corporate welfare. Why are wages so low?

 Because that’s the easiest way to increase profitability. The result?

Today, the wealthiest one percent own as much of our nation as ninety percent of the rest of us. Corporate CEOs can earn 500 times the wages paid to their workers. As a billionaire, Trump’s part of the problem. This has been going on since 1980.

Unions like the UAW were one of the reasons for the rotten quality of Cars built by the Big Four (remember AMC?) and increasing prices of that rolling junk, and the buyers switched to Imports 40 years ago. The real problem was the disconnect between increasing automation, computerization and the increased productivity, and wages. 

The US working class is the stupidest in the World – most don’t read like the Greatest Generation. It continues to vote for the very class of People who have been exploiting, frauding, and cheating them all of their lives  Union Featherbedding and high wages for lower productivity is what doomed Private Unions in US manufacturing, moving to the low Union, Right to work states.

The Trump-Trumpist Divide

Trump is not Hitler, but we must pay attention to the history of autocrats | Letters

Phyllis Gobbell

Wed, November 20, 2024, at 8:02 AM EST

Pay attention and learn from history about autocrats 

Editor’s note: Letters to the editor reflect the views of individual readers. Scroll to the bottom to see how you can add your voice, whether you agree or disagree. We welcome diverse viewpoints. Bing Videos

I won’t suggest that America is becoming 1930s Germany, but I can’t help warning Americans to pay attention.  We learn from history – if we let ourselves and accept truths we may not like to hear.

Holocaust Survivors state, “Trump is not Hitler.” – Search

My understanding of the dark path Germany followed nearly a century ago is that Hitler rose to power on the strength of three messages: 

1. White-skinned people are superior to other races and should dominate them
2. The economy is dismal, and I alone can fix it
3. I will get rid of the group that we can blame for all the country’s problems.

Does that sound familiar?

The Germans supported an authoritarian government without considering the ultimate cost. In the kind of country Hitler proposed, voters liked hearing that the group responsible for all their problems might suffer (and they did, 6 million of them). But the suffering didn’t stop there.

Letters: Shooting was wrong, but unlike Trump, Biden has never called for retribution or bloodbaths

You remember how that story ended – for Germany, and for the world – when the flawed, cruel strongman they elected did what he told them he would do.

I’m just asking you now, as an American, to be vigilant. If you are thinking you are getting the president and the country you voted for, please don’t just roll over and trust that the strongman you’ve elected will act in your best interests.

Begin with taking note of who Trump chooses for his inner circle. Are you comforted, believing the likes of Stephen Miller will care about you? Please, just pay attention. 

“The CIA was directly involved in the assassination of JFK. Oswald was a patsy.” The accusations made by Jim Garrison, the investigating attorney

MSNBC contributor warns ‘we should all fear’ Trump’s new AG pick Pam Bondi ‘because she’s competent’

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Has Laugh-Out-Loud Response To Marjorie Taylor Greene’s New Gig

Stephen Miller Says, ‘America Is For Americans And Americans Only,’ At Trump’s MSG Rally

More than 223K migrants have flooded NYC so far — double Albany’s population

North Korean leader says past diplomacy only confirmed US hostility

Lithium Batteries: Sustainable Energy or Hidden Crisis? | Watch

Was Jesus a Palestinian?

Overall, about half of Trump voters said inflation was the biggest issue factoring into their election decisions

How Trump did it again: He’s been shot, sued, put on trial, written off and endlessly branded a fascist.

 Now Donald Trump has defied his critics to crush his opponents once more | Daily Mail Online

How Trump did it again: He’s been shot, sued, put on trial, written off and endlessly branded a fascist. Now Donald Trump has defied his critics to crush his opponents once more.

• View the full results of the US election via our live-updating maps and charts

By RORY TINGLE and CHRIS POLLARD and ROB CRILLY, CHIEF U.S. POLITICAL CORRESPONDENT FOR DAILYMAIL.COM IN PALM BEACH, FLORIDA

Published: 08:22 EST, 6 November 2024 | Updated: 13:10 EST, 6 November 2024

How Trump did it again: Re-live all the action of US election 2024 – Search Videos

Donald Trump‘s resounding US election victory is far more comprehensive than anyone had predicted, as he rode a wave of support from black and Latino voters to retake the White House.  Atlas Intel Most Accurate presidential Again – Search

Central to his battle with Kamala Harris were the seven crucial swing states of Arizona, Georgia, Michigan,  Nevada, North Carolina,  Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, yet despite polls showing the pair ‘on a knife edge’ Trump is now set to win them all and – in contrast to 2016 – the popular vote too. 

Dailymail.com pollster JL Partners was one of the very few to correctly predict Trump would win both the electoral college and the popular vote. 

His triumph would have been impossible without a huge surge of support from black and Latino Americans at the same time as women voters – who liberal pundits had hoped would push Harris to victory – failed to turn out for her as expected. 

It marks an astonishing moment of political redemption for a man who was written off after his 2020 loss to Joe Biden before facing a string of unprecedented legal cases and, finally, two shocking assassination attempts. 

As so often with Trump, his win marks a series of firsts, with the Republican becoming the first former president to return to power since Grover Cleveland in 1892, the first  person convicted of a felony to be elected and, at 78, the oldest person elected to the office. 

President Trump “Never Give Up!” MOTIVATIONAL VIDEO …

As of 8.00 ET (13.00 GMT) Trump has already won the swing states of North Carolina, Georgia, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, and is currently ahead in Michigan, Nevada, and Arizona. 

And just as typically, pollsters who continually forecast the election as too close to call were proved spectacularly wrong. Yet ordinary Americans placing bets on the result appeared to be in less doubt about who would win, with the odds of a Trump winning placed at 62 per cent within hours of the polls opening. 

Some of the reasons for his triumph can be found in exit polls, which showed Hispanic men backing Trump over Harris by a 10-point margin of 54 per cent to 44 per cent. By contrast, in the 2020 contest Joe Biden won Latino males by a 23-point margin of 59 per cent to 36 per cent.   And while Harris still gained a majority of Latinas – 62 per cent – this was still down by the 69 per cent achieved by Biden. 

Crucially, Trump also made inroads with black voters, more than doubling his support among this key demographic in Wisconsin compared with 2020, according to NBC’s exit poll. Overall, about eight in 10 black voters backed Harris, down from the roughly nine in 10 who backed Mr Biden.

Even as the results started rolling in for Trump, many pollsters maintained that Harris stood a decent chance of winning last night. James Johnson, of JL Partners, can count himself among a tiny minority who correctly predicted a definitive Trump victory. He believes traditional pollsters are consistently missing Trump voters, who don’t trust the establishment and won’t engage with ‘some weirdo’ who phones up asking how they intend to vote.

‘They’ve made the same mistakes for the last three election cycles,’ he said. ‘Every time they have missed this elusive voter who is white, male, lives in the countryside, probably hasn’t got a college degree and who doesn’t trust the media. ‘These people live normal lives. They are blue collar workers who are probably pulling factory shifts. 

They don’t fancy telling some weirdo how they’re going to vote, they’ve got much better things to do. ‘Unless they drastically overhaul the way they work, pollsters will continue to miss these people.’ As well as the white working class, traditional polls also missed the big contingent of Hispanic and black Trump voters.

Mr Johnson says this is because those people are very difficult to pin down, and may not be honest in a quick vox pop-style interview. ‘They’re less engaged and less trusting, and many of them are just too busy,’ he said. ‘It’s incredibly difficult to get through to people who are juggling two or three different jobs.

‘With the non-white voters, there is a big social desirability bias. It’s still a bit awkward in a lot of black or Hispanic communities to say that you’re a Trump voter. ‘Only by conducting 60 or 90 minute interviews will you get down to what they really believe. You start to see how they view the world.’

Mr Johnson said he conducted many long interviews with Hispanic voters in swing states. In the first five or 10 minutes, they wouldn’t say they are voting for Trump. But after an hour, they started telling him they were deeply concerned about illegal migration. 

One Asian American in Detroit told him: ‘I came to this country the right way. I don’t want to lose the country I came to.’  He said another mistake made by traditional pollsters is to think that black people will automatically prefer a black candidate.

In fact, many black men did not like Kamala because they saw her as weak, and did not appreciate her endorsements from white elites like Taylor Swift. One mixed-race factory worker from Tennille, Georgia, said: ‘If you think white men have a problem with black women, wait until you hear what black men think.’

Respected American pollster Ann Selzer was among those who got it devastatingly wrong. She projected Kamala Harris would pull off a shock win in the swing state of Iowa. She predicted a very high percentage of older women were preparing to turn out for Harris, but Mr Johnson said: ‘They are just the most likely group of people to give the time of day to somebody who calls them up, because they love a good natter. 

That’s why Ann Selzer screwed up so badly.’

Mr Johnson said his more successful approach involved engaging voters where they normally look – such as in mobile phone games, where they would be offered in-game rewards for completing surveys.

Trump says there will be a ‘Golden Age’ of America under his reign – Search

While professional pollsters once again flopped, a more prescient perspective was provided by the betting markets – which enjoyed a surge of custom as Americans were allowed to bet on the result for the first time. Polymarket and Kalshi respectively gave Trump about a 62 percent to 38 percent and 59 percent to 41 percent lead over Harris a few hours after polls opened. 

Meanwhile, a spokesman for Betfair Exchange claimed it had ‘now correctly predicted 23 of the last 25 major elections across the world’. In state after state, Trump outperformed what he did in the 2020 election while Harris failed to do as well as Biden did in winning the presidency four years ago. 

For all of the showmanship, profanity and name-calling, Trump ultimately won over voters with grand promises to improve the economy, block the flow of immigrants on the southern border and his siren call to ‘make America great again’.  Overall, about half of Trump voters said inflation was the biggest issue factoring into their election decisions. 

About as many said that of the situation at the US-Mexico border, according to AP VoteCast. He also sold them the promise of the largest mass deportation effort in US history, although he has not explained how such an operation would work. And he is threatening to impose massive tariffs on key products from China and other American adversaries, which economists warn could dramatically boost prices for average Americans.

The pivotal moment came when North Carolina was called for Trump at 11:19pm (ET). Then, the quiet crowd at the official Republican watch party, held in a convention center in Florida’s West Palm Beach, erupted in a release of nervous energy. At the same time, the mood at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort – where he was sitting amid friends and family watching the results roll in – switched from cautious optimism to ‘a sense of destiny’, one attendee said.

Later at the convention center in the early hours of Wednesday morning, Trump was joined on stage by his jubilant family and campaign staff, as he addressed his adoring fans and declared: ‘We’re going to help our country heal.’ ‘This was, I believe, the greatest political movement of all time,’ he said. ‘This is a magnificent victory for the American people, that will allow us to make America great again.’

Meanwhile, Republicans have claimed control of the Senate, ousting veteran senator Sherrod Brown of Ohio and putting several other Democratic incumbents on the edge of defeat. The results will give Trump a significant advantage in pushing his agenda through Congress.

Their only hope is to win a House majority built mostly through key suburban districts in California and New York, but that was far from certain early on Wednesday. And either way, the results shrink Democrats’ geographic footprint and, with Mr Brown’s loss, diminish the kind of working class voice that can counter Mr Trump’s appeal.

Trump already succeeded in painting Democrats as out-of-touch culturally with middle America.  Now Democrats are left to wonder how to reconnect with parts of the country and slices of the electorate that rejected them. 

After announcing he would run again back in November 2022, Trump comfortably saw off other Republican hopefuls – including Florida Governor Ron DeSantis and former governor of South Carolina Nikki Haley – to secure the Party nomination in March this year.

Entering the summer, he held a comfortable polling lead over Biden, 81, whose record on the economy and immigration, as well as the obvious problem of his advancing age, were proving disastrous among voters. 

The now notorious CNN television debate between the two presumptive nominees on June 27 – in which Biden froze and mumbled, appearing unable to clearly answer even basic questions – only helped Trump.

.

On July 13, while addressing crowds at a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, the bullet of would-be assassin Thomas Matthew Crooks ripped through Trump’s right ear. After being swarmed by Secret Service agents, Trump rose to his feet – his shoes missing and his face bloodied – pumping his fist in the air and shouting: ‘Fight! Fight! Fight!’  Just days later, he received a hero’s welcome in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, at the Republican National Convention. 

MAGA fans donned mock bandages on their ears in solidarity with the former president and, in a stirring speech on the final night, Trump told a packed-out convention center that he would be a ‘president for all of America’. But, just three days later, everything changed. Holed up in Camp David with his family, Biden posted a bombshell letter on X announcing that he was withdrawing from the 2024 race.

 ‘I believe it is in the best interest of my party and the country for me to stand down and to focus solely on fulfilling my duties as President for the remainder of my term,’ he wrote, before endorsing Kamala Harris as his replacement on the Democratic ticket within the hour. 

Harris swiftly corralled support, raking in more than $100 million in donor cash in 24 hours. As she formally accepted the party nomination at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago the following month – a star-studded event featuring the likes of Oprah, Eva Longoria and Kerry Washington – she was polling comfortably ahead of Trump.

Harris then trounced Trump in the first and last TV debate between the pair on September 10. His wild accusation that Haitian migrants were ‘eating the dogs […] eating the cats’ of American citizens was an instant internet meme.

In fact, such was Harris’s surging popularity that a second attempt to assassinate Trump – on his West Palm Beach golf course just days later – barely moved the needle. Fresh pain came for the Trump campaign as his running mate – and now the Vice President-elect – Ohio Senator JD Vance, was hit by a string of disinterred comments in which he attacked female Democrats.

In the most damning, from a 2021 interview, he called Harris, and other women who don’t have children of their own, ‘childless cat ladies who are miserable at their own lives’. Indeed, a gender divide swiftly became a key feature of the 2024 race. 

Trump’s role in helping to reverse Roe v Wade in 2022, removing the constitutional right to an abortion and returning the decision on related laws to the states, has proven particularly unpopular with female voters.

The final ABC/Ipsos poll, published this Sunday, had Harris with an 11-point advantage among women. In the end, however, it seems abortion wasn’t the silver-bullet issue Harris had hoped for.

 In Florida, Governor DeSantis’s controversial 6-week abortion ban was also on the ballot. But, despite having won every other pro-abortion ballot measure since Roe v. Wade was overturned, Democrats failed for the first time on Tuesday, falling short of the 60 percent of votes needed to overturn the Florida ban.

This time around, he controls the Republican National Committee with his daughter-in-law, Lara Trump (pictured with husband Eric in October), at the helm

Trump, meanwhile, has made substantial inroads with male voters this year. Despite liberal criticisms that he and Vance were making the campaign – complete with a shirt-ripping Hulk Hogan – too ‘bro-tastic’, it appears a strong male voter turnout helped Trump clinch it in the end.

In recent weeks, Harris’s healthy poll lead waned, as she finally buckled to pressure to submit herself to rigorous TV interviews. Her rambling and often incoherent answers to questions drew ire even among fans, with veteran Dem strategist David Axelrod last month accusing Harris of going to ‘word salad city’.

In the final days of the campaign, pollsters were almost unanimous in their verdict: this race was too close to call. Some Trump-friendly analysts, however, pointed to the fact he is consistently under-polled, and that a dead-heat suggested he had the advantage. 

Certainly, the immigration crisis on the Southern border, the state of the economy and inflation, as well as the Biden-Harris administration’s record on foreign affairs – from the botched Afghanistan withdrawal in 2021, to Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine, and the outbreak of war in Israel last year – all worked in Trump’s favor.

Following his victory, Trump must now prepare for government once again, undoubtedly drawing from a band of MAGA loyalists who have stuck with him through roiling controversies.

In 2016, he brought in officials from the Republican National Committee as well as from the armed forces who were seen as moderating influences. Trump, meanwhile, has made substantial inroads with male voters this year. Despite liberal criticisms that he and Vance were making the campaign – complete with a shirt-ripping Hulk Hogan – too ‘bro-tastic’, it appears a strong male voter turnout helped Trump clinch it in the end.

In recent weeks, Harris’s healthy poll lead waned, as she finally buckled to pressure to submit herself to rigorous TV interviews. Her rambling and often incoherent answers to questions drew ire even among fans, with veteran Dem strategist David Axelrod last month accusing Harris of going to ‘word salad city’.

In the final days of the campaign, pollsters were almost unanimous in their verdict: this race was too close to call. Some Trump-friendly analysts, however, pointed to the fact he is consistently under-polled, and that a dead-heat suggested he had the advantage. 

Certainly, the immigration crisis on the Southern border, the state of the economy and inflation, as well as the Biden-Harris administration’s record on foreign affairs – from the botched Afghanistan withdrawal in 2021, to Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine, and the outbreak of war in Israel last year – all worked in Trump’s favor.

Following his victory, Trump must now prepare for government once again, undoubtedly drawing from a band of loyalists who have stuck with him through roiling controversies. In 2016, he brought in officials from the Republican National Committee as well as from the armed forces who were seen as moderating influences.

‘It wasn’t necessarily the act of making French fries or running the drive-thru window.

 

Donald Trump works at McDonald’s as he dons an apron & makes French fries.

‘It was when he made his approach in the motorcade down the street in Bucks County in Feasterville [PA]. There were 10,000 people lining the street, ten deep on both sides, and that was not a crowd that we built.’ The McDonald’s stunt was meant to be unadvertised, but a local paper got hold of the details and published a story, bringing out a spontaneous crowd.

DONALD Trump has donned an apron to make French fries – as he tried out working at McDonald’s. The Republican presidential candidate worked a shift under the golden arches in the swing state of Pennsylvania today. He said: “I’m looking for a job. And I’ve always wanted to work at McDonald’s but I never did. “I’m running against somebody that said she did, but it turned out to be a totally phony story.”

Donald Trump Did Not Actually Work at McDonald’s – Eater

Read More: Donald Trump seen serving up Big Macs & fries at McDonald’s as he trolls rival Kamala Harris over her old job  | The Sun

In the end, an equally spontaneous and sizable voter turnout – both in early ballots and on Election Day itself – buoyed Trump to victory and kick-started a second term that no doubt will be as dramatic and consequential as the first.

Laura: The DC swamp lies under scrutiny | Watch

‘If we’re not careful, we’re going to spend this country into oblivion.’   

Most of the politicians in Washington, DC are focused on a push to spend trillions of more taxpayer dollars on President Biden’s agenda. But Senator Rand Paul is raising the alarm about all the money the federal government has already spent—that it doesn’t have.   

“We’re rapidly approaching a milestone in our country, it’s not a good one: $30 trillion in debt,” Paul noted in a fiery Senate speech on Thursday, October 7, 2021. He said the federal government is accumulating “$2 million per minute” in new debt.  

Why is the fiscal situation so out of control? The senator blamed the “bait and switch” politics of big government spending and the welfare state.  

“People are saying we’re going to give you free college, free cars, free cell phones, free this, free that,” Paul said. “Everything in life will be free, you won’t have to work anymore. The problem is there are ramifications. Money doesn’t grow on trees… money has got to come from somewhere.” 

“Either we borrow it… we tax people for it, or we simply print the money,” he continued. “When the Federal Reserve prints the money, as we increase the money supply, the money we already have becomes worth less and less. It loses its purchasing power. This is the insidious tax of inflation. Inflation is a regressive tax… it affects the working class, lower income people, and those on fixed incomes, much worse.” 

Paul’s arguments come amid data showing that consumer prices have risen at the highest annual rates in 30 years. The senator blamed, in part, policy decisions and reckless spending at all levels of government for this harmful trend. 

“Right now, we’re facing 5 percent inflation, because of the massive borrowing that really both parties instituted in the last year,” he said. “They decided that the result of the pandemic would be to close everything down, destroy the economy, and give everyone free money. It’s primarily been Democrats this year… but both parties have a certain responsibility for this.”

“As government gets larger and larger, people think they’re getting free stuff,” he continued. “But it’s not really free. This is the allure of socialism… it’s a false allure… socialism doesn’t work. It is this alarming tendency to want to offer everybody everything and say it’s going to be free. Many of these things backfire.”

The senator briefly explained how the federal government wound up nearly $30 trillion in debt. For one, he cites rampant waste like the feds’ spending millions on a study into whether cocaine makes quail more sexually promiscuous. 

“Studies like that are littered throughout the federal budget,” he lamented. Within the bigger picture, the vast entitlement programs composing our welfare state are what’s driving us off a fiscal cliff. 

“Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, food stamps, other welfare, military…  if you look at all that on an annual basis, before you get to the extraordinary binge of the last two years, we were already $1 trillion short every year,” Paul explained. “So last year we added a couple trillion more… and our deficit for one year was $3 trillion.

We’ve never borrowed that much. There are going to be ramifications. You’re already seeing some of the ramifications; prices in the grocery store going up, prices at the pump go up, prices going up faster than wages.”

Despite all these warning signs, many of Paul’s colleagues in Congress are pushing $4.5 trillion more in spending on top of it all. “If we’re not careful, we’re going to spend this country into oblivion,” the senator concluded.   

He’s right. But it’s not too late to avert this path, if more of our elected officials wake up to our fiscal crisis and heed Rand Paul’s warning.

.

This is a strikingly a historical choice.

A bit more than a decade ago, One Big Ass Mistake America, with his first term occurring under united Democratic party rule, contributed just shy of $2.2 trillion in new spending during his time in office, or more than $1 trillion less than Biden.

He was met with loud and sustained opposition.

In Summary: Biden’s administration has spent more than any other. 

Why are several departments claiming to be out of money?

U.S. Debt by President: Dollar and Percentage 2024 | ConsumerAffairs®

(No) Thanks to Trump’s Tariffs: 18 More Items About to Cost A Lot More | Watch

The following are the Federal Fiscal Year budget deficits from the St. louis Fed starting with the year prior to the Trump Admin to present, 2016 – 585 billion 2017 – 665 billion 2018 – 779 billion 2019 – 984 billion 2020 – 3.132 trillion (pandemic relief programs) 2021 – 2.775 trillion 2022 – 1.376 trillion 2023 – 1.696 trillion 2024 – 1.834 trillion.

Google what the debt was when Biden was installed. – Search –Google for it now. 

Then, add one billion dollars per DAY through 1-20-25.    

In 2025, Interest on the Debt will be Trillion Dollars That is the total sum damage this admin has spent since he was inserted like a plumbing shit plunger device. 

It is amazing how this incompetent and dementia ridden man was put in this position in the first place… this is why they are being replaced by people who understand the waste of public funds.  You can’t just keep printing money …. with a hidden tax of 25% to 30% on everything we buy in the form of inflation. 

Good point, but I fail to see the magic that will rebuild the Francis Scott Key Bridge, or the repairs to Transportation infrastructure from hurricanes and flooding during the past 6 to 9 months.  These things generally require funding. You only have congress to blame for this madness.  

They dilly dally around with the budget and who comes up short?  

We the People… That’s right the very people we send them there to take care of.  We elect both democrats and republicans to make sure the country is funded.  Funding that is supposed to be available on October 1st. This process hasn’t been done on time in 29 years.  So there you have it folks incompetence at its best.

Meaningful comments you say? 

HMMM, FEMA withheld funding to Trump supporters, Biden/Harris and Mayorkas robbed FEMA funding dollars to fund Biden’s migrants, to what extent we don’t know yet. Biden’s request for “FEMA” funding isn’t all going to FEMA, if you look at his request for funding fine print you’ll see that is a fact.

And last but not least the current admin has ZERO credibility in regard to spending the taxpayers money wisely and even going to the extent of lying about where it’s going. Had enough yet? There’s a reason Joey got booted by his own party as well as a reason the Lib/Dems got Annihilated in the election. 

The American people are fed up with their bs.  

The Biden administration spent trillions of dollars we didn’t have on things we didn’t need.  What a bunch of incompetent people.  Well, Biden, Harris and Mayorkas raided just about every department to pay for the migrant invasion. Of course, they went into the DOT funds to pay for all the buses and charter flights to move them all over the country.

INVESTING IN AMERICA:

Biden-Harris Administration Announces More Than $4.2 Billion From the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law for Transformational, National Infrastructure Projects, (roads & bridges) Monday, October 21, 2024, This was taken from the DOT website.

 How can you waste that much money in so short a time and see no results?

Much Like Kamala Harris Spending $1.5 Billion in 107 days on her failure 😉

During Biden’s Regime: How many billions were wasted on non-citizens?

Like the ones that murdered Laken Riley, Jocelyn Nungaray, & Rachel Morin?

How much was spent flying in millions from other countries?

How much was spent on the Hunter Biden’s Cocaine habit and what was on his laptop?

Hey Pothole Petey. What did you do with the budget?  

“One disaster away from being completely out of funding”: Pete Buttigieg gives warning about Transportation Dept. funds.

 Now we know where Biden has been getting all the money for Ukraine.  The state dept says they have only spent 50 billion on weapons since 2022.  add that to the pentagons unbalanced budget for the seventh time in a row.  The fema budget that they claim has spent 1.4 billion on housing for illegals.   

Bill Clinton: Trump has done ‘everything he could’ to ‘destroy’ confidence in government

Brad Koffel, EP. 15- THE INDICTMENT OF DONALD J. TRUMP – Apr 1, 2023

Does anyone believe this bullshit for one second?  

Biden’s administration has bled money like a jugular wound since 2021.  No one can say where the money went and exactly how much has been spent. Add to that Biden sold the wall materials and our oil reserve to China.  Also, all that money went to Ukraine.  We need to know exactly what this man has taken from us Americans.  Think we ever will?  

It will take this rebuilt Trump administration a lot to even come close to straightening this mess out. Biden also robbed from Medicare to Pay Illegals to invade our border and now this. Next, they are leading us into WWIII and will blame it all on Trump. 

The woke Left’s takeover of the US military is a real and present danger

Gone but not forgotten: Trump aims to revive the Keystone XL pipeline

Opinion: Donald Trump is not a fascist. Why that label is inaccurate.

Sounds like one heck of a crooked admin Biden was running. 

CAMARILLO, Calif. — Al and Phyllis Nordquist lived in the same home on Garrido Drive for 53 years.

It’s where the couple raised their three kids and became empty nesters, grandparents and then great-grandparents.  “It was just so peaceful, we thought this is where we want to spend the rest of our life,” Phyllis, 87, said. 

But all of it was gone within minutes when the Mountain Fire tore through their neighborhood. The couple rushed to evacuate after a neighbor alerted them that the flames were closing in on their home. 

“I said, ‘Well, let me get my Volvo out,’” Al, 89, recalled.

“He said, ‘No. He says, now. It’s going to hit.’ And he was right.”

The Mountain Fire in Ventura County, northwest of Los Angeles, started Nov. 6 and rapidly grew to nearly 20,000 because of winds. On Monday, it was 98 percent contained, officials said.

Before it was under control, thousands of residents were forced to evacuate and more than 200 structures, including the Nordquists’ home, were destroyed. Nearly all of the couple’s possessions were reduced to ashes.

“Basically, it was our life. Our whole life is right here where we lived,” Al said, standing outside what was left of his property. “I didn’t think, well, what would be left or not be left,” Phyllis said. “I just was hoping, whatever was left, at least, that we’d have pictures or something.”

A bookshelf that held their wedding album remained.© Courtesy Nordquist family

When Al and Phyllis Nordquist returned to their home after evacuating because of the Mountain Fire, most of their possessions had been destroyed.

They were shocked to return home and discover one thing untouched among the rubble: a single bookshelf containing one of their most important possessions — their wedding album.

 The fire spared irreplaceable photos from the day they married in 1961 ,a day Al calls “the best day of my life.” “I mean, we were young and in love and the rest of it just didn’t matter to me,” he said.

“I had her and I got the prize.”

For Phyllis, the album serves as a symbol of the life they started together 63 years ago.  

And now, in their late 80s, it’s a symbol yet again as they rebuild.

“That was our beginning, and now we’re experiencing a new beginning,” she said.

The home that Al and Phyllis Nordquist lived in for decades was destroyed in Camarillo, Calif., in the Mountain Fire. © Courtesy Nordquist Family

The couple says their faith, love and community — including beloved neighbors who started a fundraiser to help them get back on their feet — will get them through.

“For some reason, I have great peace in my heart and excitement for what’s to come in the future,” Phyllis said. “It’s a place God provided for us,” Al said. “And also, we’re extremely happy to be here and to still own the property and be able to rebuild.”

This article was originally published on NBCNews.com

California couple of 63 years loses nearly everything in Mountain Fire except their wedding album

We are raising money to help our dear neighbors restart and rebuild their lives after losing their homes and everything they had to the Mountain Fire. Four homes on our street burned to the ground, and the homes next door suffered terrible smoke damage.

The money raised here will be split evenly among the Garrido Drive fire victims who could really use some help getting their lives back on track and the neighbors who need help with costly smoke remediation.

The families who need to rebuild are facing a multi-year process with insurance to rebuild and may not receive the full amount they need to repurchase home items, clothes and furniture, and smoke remediation can add up to thousands of dollars and is often not covered fully by insurance.

Heartbreaking or miraculous?

How a California couple’s love story defied a devastating fire!

Al and Phyllis Nordquist take stock of the damage to their home Camarillo, Calif., which was destroyed in this month’s Mountain Fire. © Courtesy Nordquist Family

Here’s a bit more about our neighbors who lost their homes. Al and Phyllis Nordquist have lived on our street for 55 years and are the original owners of their home. They raised their family there with love and faith and have lost everything. They’re in their late 80’s, but they are determined to rebuild their family house and call Garrido Drive home once again.

Adam and Maddie Zack and their young daughter moved to Garrido Drive three years ago. Adam operates a tugboat, and Maddie grew flowers for her business from the backyard of their house, so losing their home is also losing business and income to their family. Their daughter is just starting school, and she loves Harry Potter and Hello Kitty.

Dick & Sherie Galante have lived in their home, formerly owned by Dick’s parents, since the 1990’s. Dick just returned home from the hospital one month ago from reconstructive gastrointestinal surgery. Their home was their own art gallery with three generations of antiques collected by their families, and more than 300 sculptures made by Sherie’s father, Lou Rankin, a sculptor who made art for the White House and global art events. Those sculptures and memories were all destroyed, but the Galante’s say there is nowhere else they could imagine calling home and are determined to rebuild.

We live across the street from Al & Phyllis and have lived next door to all these families for almost a decade. We launched this fundraiser to help our friends and neighbors start the journey to normalcy because our home was spared. Two thirds of the money from the fundraiser will be given to the families who lost their homes on our street, and the remaining third will be given to any neighbors with smoke or flame damage to their homes that need help reaching their insurance deductible. We plan to run the fundraiser for one month, and dispense checks to our neighbors after 2 weeks and then again at the end of the month!

Show your support for this GoFundMe:

https://www.gofundme.com/f/help-our-neighbors-rebuild-after-the-mountain-fire