Two Charts Destroy Big Lie

Wildfire threatens Santa Clarita, California. Photo: Jeff Turner, licensed under
(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/deed.en).

The Great Yellowstone Fire (1988) – YouTube
A lightning strike started a small forest fire in the Crown Butte region of Yellowstone National Park, which became known as the Fan Fire1. This fire was one of many that collectively formed the largest wildfire in the recorded history of Yellowstone National Park, burning almost 800,000 acres due to drought conditions and increasing winds 234 .
More than 25,000 firefighters fought 50 wildfires, 7 of which became major wildfires 3. The fires almost destroyed two major visitor destinations and the entire park was closed to all non-emergency personnel for the first time in its history 2. *About 300 large mammals perished as a direct result of the fires 4.

Two Charts Destroy Big Lie About ‘Climate Change’ And Wildfires
Written by I & I Editorial Board August 13, 2021

100-year wildfires – Bing video 
It’s that time of year again, the season of headlines routinely screaming about
“record” amounts of acreage burned from out-of-control wildfires caused by,
of course, “climate change.” But is it true?
Is global warming driving a surge in wildfires? The answer is no.
The media started again this week with the release of the United Nation’s
latest dire climate change report, based on the same faulty models and filled
with more apocalyptic predictions that won’t come true.

Recent screaming headlines tell the tale:
Wildfires rage across the world as U.N. releases damning climate change report
— Yahoo News
Why the Dixie Fire won’t stop burning — Mashable
Dry, hot, windy: Explosive wildfires in Northern California could burn until winter 
— USA Today
Greek wildfires are the ‘harsh reality of climate change,’ experts warn — NBC News

We could go on. It’s become an annual summer mantra from the media,
this time driven by large wildfires that happen to coincide with the release
of the U.N. report.
The truth is, in the U.S. we are not at a “record” for wildfire burning by a longshot.
As the charts below show, wildfire burns were far worse in the early- to mid-20th century, with massive amounts of acreage charred before there was any significant global warming to speak of.

image.png
So based on 20th century history, the most recent fires are way below the
levels in the 1920s and 1930s, when more than 50 million acres burned in some years.
(The chart ends in 2017; more recent data show that from 2018 through 2020, wildfires averaged just under 7.9 million acres burned each year).

Further underscoring the spurious correlation between wildfires
and climate change is a related chart presented to Congress several years back during testimony by David B. South, an emeritus professor of forestry at Auburn University.
It too is enlightening, because it’s one you’ll never see in the mainstream media.
It shows the same wildfire data charted above against CO2 increases back to 1926.

image.png

Again, no correlation whatsoever.

Or as South noted in his 2014 testimony to Congress:
Untrue claims about the underlying cause of wildfires can spread like ‘wildfire.’ …
For example, the false idea that ‘Wildfires in 2012 burned a record 9.2 million acres in
the U.S.’ is cited in numerous articles and is found on more than 2,000 web sites across
the internet. In truth … in 1930, wildfires burned more than four times that amount.
Wildfire in 2012 was certainly an issue of concern, but did those who push an agenda
really need to make exaggerated claims to fool the public?

That doesn’t mean that wildfires don’t matter.
But why is that, if it’s not due to climate change?
Over the last 20 years, there has been a small uptick in their size and intensity.
Once upon a time, Americans managed their forest resources. They logged for lumber.
They used controlled burns to get rid of highly combustible brushy areas.
They cleared deadwood. Starting in the mid-1990s, at the behest of the politically powerful and increasingly radical environmental movement, President Bill Clinton sharply curved western forest management, largely to save the endangered Spotted Owl.
California, which has had some of the worst wildfires of all, passed rules that curtailed logging and forest clearing operations. Meanwhile, successive governors, from Arnold Schwarzenegger to Jerry Brown to current Gov. Gavin Newsom, have all blamed global warming for the fires.

Better that than take responsibility for your own poor policies.
“Every year about 3.8 billion board feet of new timber grows in the Golden State,
capturing almost one metric ton of CO2 per acre in the productive timberland areas,”
 wrote former California State Assemblyman Chuck Devore, now a resident of Texas.
“Trees grow until they die, burn, or get harvested. If harvesting declines, tree mortality
and fires increase. It’s the tyranny of math.”

Unfortunately, the federal regulations didn’t help.
Spotted Owl populations continue to decline, with the major reasons now cited as competition from the Barred Owl, an invasive species, and “high-severity wildfire,” ironically a result of the very regulations the government put in place to protect the birds.
That’s not to say that warmer temperatures don’t affect fires; they do. And “climate change” is a fact, because the climate is always changing. But “global warming” is not implicated because there’s been little or no change in the rate of warming since 1998.

So why are more fires happening?
Many reasons. Because More people live in remote areas,
and all it takes is one moment’s carelessness with a match
and thousands of acres can burn. But other reasons loom larger.
The 2018 Paradise Fire destroyed 10,000 homes and killed 85 people, one the worst wildfires ever. Its cause: faulty equipment managed by PG&E, California’s largest utility. The equipment in question dated back to 1921.
This wasn’t simple incompetence. PG&E, like other utilities, has been hard-pressed
to perform maintenance and rebuild its aging infrastructure, given the new focus on
“green energy,” now mandated by both the federal and state governments.

California radio talk show host John Kobylt:
In a recent video for Prager University, noted that in 2018, the year of the big fire,
PG&E spent $2.4 billion on “renewable energy.” The year before, it spent just
$1.4 billion on existing infrastructure.
“It’s not that the power company didn’t know there was a problem,” Kobylt said.
“They knew. But they were focused on more pressing political priorities.
Like green energy.” This leads to a further irony: Despite having some of the biggest forests in the nation, California’s fire-prone timberland is now a net generator of CO2 
in the atmosphere.
Given such priorities and the clear mismanagement of our nation’s forests,
particularly in California, the recent increase in wildfires should come as no surprise.
Those who blithely blame “climate change” for “record wildfires” are simply wrong.

Related Articles:
Is California’s Economy On The Brink Due To Climate Change?
February 1, 2021In “Excerpt”
What We’re Reading Today: Trump ‘Retarded,’ Global Warming A Political Loser,
San Francisco Takes It Too Far … And More September 9, 2019In “News Roundup”
Another Warning Of ‘Imminent’ Climate Catastrophe April 29, 2019, In “Environment”.

Glen
August 20, 2021 at 8:59 pm
No, that won’t work. That warming trend ended about 8,000 years ago, and then it started a long cooling trend. The recent warming started around 1970, a much shorter, so far, but much faster warming trend.

Heidi
August 14, 2021 at 1:29 pm
Not to mention deranged democrats responsible for arson:
 california-college-professor-set-arson-fire-near-dixie-fire-authorities-say – Search (bing.com)

Donald Olson
August 16, 2021 at 10:08 am
The “real problem” is population growth, especially in California,
and into these beautiful areas prone to forest fire activity.

Jonathan Galt
August 16, 2021 at 12:05 pm
“So, it’s warming like never before, but as long as it’s a constant rate it’s not a problem?”
Well, first off that statement is untrue even in RECENT (past millennia) times.
There HAVE been periods in history which warmed a bit faster, or at least as fast.
But, while interesting, that is irrelevant to your bigger supposition.
Second, the answer to your “question” is that no, it is NOT a problem. Oh, it might be if
it were going to go on for another 80 years. However, it won’t – and that is demonstrable.
Solar energy has been declining in price exponentially for over 60 years. It shows no signs of hitting limits which would prevent it from continuing for about another 20 years.
We only need 10. By then, daytime immediate use utility scale solar will be so cheap that it will cost less to manufacture cleaner burning carbon-neutral synthetic substitutes for gas, diesel, and jet fuel. 
Although the process has existed since the 1930s, it never made sense before because until now the cheapest way to create electricity was to burn oil – and it required burning about 2 barrels of oil to make 1 barrel of synthetic. Now, however, solar just needs to get a little bit cheaper and petroleum is toast because it will cost more to drill, pump, and refine petroleum than to manufacture cleaner fuels for our legacy equipment. https://phys.org/news/2020-07-low-cost-catalyst-seawater-fuel-scale.html

So, you can breathe easy now.
Armageddon is cancelled, and we don’t even have to wreck the economy to stop it.
Fossil fuels are toast by 2040. Why? Because for what legacy equipment still remains
by then nobody will want to pay MORE for “real fossil fuels” when they can buy cleaner burning, carbon-neutral synthetics for less.
The process (Fischer-Tropsch) has been around since the 1930s, but since the cheapest way to generate electricity historically has always been to burn oil, it could NEVER be economical (burn 2 barrels of oil to make 1? Dumb.). Solar is turning that on its head.
If the 60-year trend of solar energy continues for just 10 more years, making these synthetics will be cheaper than drilling, pumping, and refining oil.
Nah, the real problem is that stupid politicians caved to people who “didn’t like the smokey smell” of controlled burns, and so stopped using good forestry practices.
Pay me now, or pay me later says mother nature…  https://phys.org/news/2020-07-low-cost-catalyst-seawater-fuel-scale.html 

Source: Two Charts Destroy Big Lie About ‘Climate Change’ And Wildfires – Issues & Insights (issuesinsights.com)
What extreme fire seasons, and 2,500 years of forest history, tell us about the future of wildfires in the West (phys.org)

New report reveals 98% of world population experienced alarming trend this summer: ‘Virtually no one on Earth escaped’ (msn.com)
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Time limit is exhausted. Please reload the CAPTCHA.